CCATClinical Analysis Tool
‹ Knowledge base

Browse the corpus

Walk the evidence base by book and chapter — the raw source passages that ground Ask, Differential, and the rest.

1 passage

abstractpubmed· abstract· item 39623403

BACKGROUND: Emodin has protective effects on acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This meta-analysis intended to illustrate the efficacy of emodin on ALI/ARDS animal models. METHODS: Relevant preclinical studies were searched on PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with corresponding confidence intervals (CIs) were used to compare lung injury scores, lung wet-to-dry weight ratios (W/D), myeloperoxidase (MPO), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, IL-18, PaO2, and PaCO2 between the treatment and control groups. The article quality was appraised using the SYRCLE tool. RESULTS: Twenty one studies published between 2014 and 2023 were enrolled. Compared with the control group, emodin significantly reduced lung injury scores (SMD: -3.63; 95% CI: -4.36, -2.90; p < 0.00001), W/D ratios (SMD: -3.23; 95% CI: -4.29, -2.16; p < 0.00001), and MPO levels (SMD: -2.96; 95% CI: -3.92, -1.99; p < 0.00001). Furthermore, emodin downregulated TNF-α (SMD: -3.04; 95% CI: -3.62, -2.47; p < 0.00001), IL-1β (SMD: -3.76; 95% CI: -4.65, -2.87; p < 0.00001), IL-6 (SMD: -3.19; 95% CI: -3.95, -2.43; p < 0.00001), and IL-18 levels (SMD: -4.83; 95% CI: -6.10, -3.57; p < 0.00001). Emodin improved gas exchange dysfunction, increased PaO2 (SMD: 3.76; 95% CI: 2.41, 5.11; p < 0.00001), and decreased PaCO2 (SMD: -3.83; 95% CI: -4.90, -2.76; p < 0.00001). Sensitivity analyses and stratified analyses were conducted for outcome measures with heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Emodin treatment can effectively reduce the severity of ALI in animal models. Additional animal investigations and clinical trials involving human subjects are imperative.