Browse the corpus
Walk the evidence base by book and chapter — the raw source passages that ground Ask, Differential, and the rest.
6 passages
Lack of safety-netting or follow-up instructions in primary care consultations is low-value. Why: Clear safety-netting and follow-up plans are essential for patient safety; their absence may lead to delayed care for worsening symptoms.
Diagnosis-complaint mismatches (documented diagnosis without corresponding complaint) indicate low-value care. Why: Mismatches between diagnoses and presenting complaints suggest unnecessary or incorrect coding, leading to inappropriate treatments or investigations.
Topical nasal decongestants (e.g., oxymetazoline) prescribed for >3 days are low-value due to risk of rebound congestion. Why: Prolonged use of topical decongestants can cause rhinitis medicamentosa; they should be limited to short-term use (≤3 days).
Failing to provide or document specific follow-up instructions or safety-netting advice for the patient is proposed as low-value care. Why: Clear instructions on when to seek further care are essential for patient safety and managing clinical uncertainty.
Failing to provide clear safety-netting or follow-up instructions for a patient's condition is a gap in care. Why: Safety-netting is a critical component of patient safety, ensuring patients know when and how to seek further care.
Prescribing a medication without providing clear follow-up instructions or safety-netting advice is low-value care. Why: Clear instructions on when to seek further care are crucial for patient safety and timely management of worsening conditions.