Browse the corpus

Gastric emptying in pregnancy and its clinical implications: a narrative review. Delayed gastric emptying increases the risk of pulmonary aspiration during anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery. Our aim in conducting this narrative review was to consider the effect of pregnancy on gastric emptying. The indices of gastric emptying after liquids, solids, or both and when fasted in the various trimesters of pregnancy, at the time of Caesarean delivery, in labour, and the postpartum period were assessed. We considered 32 observational studies, one nonrandomised controlled study, and 22 randomised controlled trials. The evidence indicates that, compared with the nonpregnant state, gastric emptying is decreased in the first but not the second and third trimesters. Before elective Caesarean delivery, carbohydrate drink or tea with milk leads to no difference in gastric cross-sectional area at 2 h relative to fasting or water. Following a standard fast for elective Caesarean delivery, patients may still have high-risk gastric contents. Compared with the nonpregnant state and third trimester, gastric emptying is delayed in labour, although the choice of analgesia has modifying effects. Systemic opioids delay gastric emptying. Epidural analgesia increases gastric emptying, but not back to baseline. Intrathecal analgesia delays gastric emptying relative to epidural analgesia. Women in labour who have eaten solids in the last 8 h still have high-risk gastric contents present in the stomach. The evidence with respect to the postpartum period is conflicting. In conclusion, inconsistencies in the literature reflect the unpredictability of gastric emptying in pregnancy and underline the potential value of gastric ultrasound in women who are pregnant.

In this narrative review, our inclusion criteria consisted of females who were pregnant or in the postpartum period and had an evaluation of their gastric emptying performed while fasted or in response to liquids, solids, or both. This included women who were in any trimester of pregnancy, in labour, or having elective or emergency Caesarean delivery. Gastric emptying in the different phases of pregnancy or the postpartum period may have been compared or it may have been compared relative to the nonpregnant phase. The exclusion criteria involved any single and standalone assessment of gastric content or volume without ongoing evaluation of the change in these indices over time. Using a mixed methods approach, we included observational studies, nonrandomised controlled trials, and randomised controlled trials. No restrictions were made on the language of publication.

ngle and standalone assessment of gastric content or volume without ongoing evaluation of the change in these indices over time. Using a mixed methods approach, we included observational studies, nonrandomised controlled trials, and randomised controlled trials. No restrictions were made on the language of publication. We conducted a search strategy from inception to January 24, 2024 of the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Elton B Stephens Company (EBSCO) Global Health, Excerpta Medica (Embase), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Scopus, and World of Science (WoS). The full search included free text keywords and medical subject headings such as gastric emptying, gastric motility, stomach, obstetric, and pregnancy (Supplementary Appendix S1). Subsequent to deduplication, all citations were uploaded to Rayyan, the reference managing software (Qatar Computing Research Institute, 2016, Doha, Qatar),17 and abstract screening of these citations was performed by two blinded authors (RH, PP). Discrepancies were resolved through discussion or, if no agreement was reached, by a third author (ND). The full text of all potentially eligible citations was retrieved before a final screening for eligibility by one author (ND), and a single author (CG) hand searched the reference lists of included studies for additional citations relevant to this review.

cussion or, if no agreement was reached, by a third author (ND). The full text of all potentially eligible citations was retrieved before a final screening for eligibility by one author (ND), and a single author (CG) hand searched the reference lists of included studies for additional citations relevant to this review. The following data, if available, were extracted by authors (JL, RH, ND, JS, CG, PP) from the included studies: design of study; trimester of pregnancy or time since delivery; labour or not; Caesarean delivery or not; comparator groups; number of patients; method of assessing gastric emptying and conditions related to this evaluation such as whether it was performed subsequent to drug administration or ingestion of solids; and relevant findings such as the gastric half emptying time. The methodological quality and risk of bias of studies were examined by two blinded authors (ML, DO), with discrepancies resolved via discussion or, if required, a third author (ND). For nonrandomised studies and randomised controlled trials, the Risk of Bias In Non-randomised Studies – of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool were used, respectively.18,19

In all, 55 citations fulfilled the inclusion criteria (Fig. 1),5,20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73 and 32 were observational studies,5,20,21,24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,35,38,40,42,51,57, 58, 59, 60,63, 64, 65, 66,68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73 one was a nonrandomised controlled study,23 and 22 were randomised controlled trials.22,34,36,37,39,41,43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,52, 53, 54, 55, 56,61,62,67Fig 1PRISMA flow diagram summarising the retrieved, included, and excluded studies. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.Fig 1 PRISMA flow diagram summarising the retrieved, included, and excluded studies. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

In all, 55 citations fulfilled the inclusion criteria (Fig. 1),5,20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73 and 32 were observational studies,5,20,21,24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,35,38,40,42,51,57, 58, 59, 60,63, 64, 65, 66,68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73 one was a nonrandomised controlled study,23 and 22 were randomised controlled trials.22,34,36,37,39,41,43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,52, 53, 54, 55, 56,61,62,67Fig 1PRISMA flow diagram summarising the retrieved, included, and excluded studies. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.Fig 1 PRISMA flow diagram summarising the retrieved, included, and excluded studies. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. The studies were composed of five different patient cohorts: nonpregnant (18)5,21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29,64,66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71,73; first trimester (T1), defined as start of pregnancy to week 12 (10)21,22,24,26, 27, 28, 29, 30,32,72; second trimester (T2), that is weeks 13–26 of pregnancy (5)21,26,28,30,72; third trimester (T3), that is week 27 of pregnancy until labour (19)2,5,20,21,23,25,26,28,30, 31, 32,38,53,64,65,70, 71, 72, 73; Caesarean delivery (8)36,51,52,54, 55, 56, 57, 58; labour (20)33, 34, 35, 36, 37,39, 40, 41,43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50,59,64,70,71; postpartum, that is from immediately following delivery until 6 weeks thereafter (15)21,35,57,59, 60, 61, 62, 63,65, 66, 67, 68, 69,72,73; and nonpregnant after postpartum, defined as greater than 6 weeks but less than 15 months subsequent to delivery due to the potential of residual physiological changes from pregnancy and ongoing breast feeding (3).28,30,32

owing delivery until 6 weeks thereafter (15)21,35,57,59, 60, 61, 62, 63,65, 66, 67, 68, 69,72,73; and nonpregnant after postpartum, defined as greater than 6 weeks but less than 15 months subsequent to delivery due to the potential of residual physiological changes from pregnancy and ongoing breast feeding (3).28,30,32 Of the observational studies that were assessed with ROBINS-I, just two were demonstrated to have low risk of bias54,71 and the remaining 19 and five were found to be at moderate5,21,23,24,26, 27, 28, 29, 30,32,35,38,58,60,63, 64, 65, 66,69 or high25,68,70,72,73 risk of bias, respectively (Fig. 2). Deficiencies in the observational studies were mainly shown in the domains of confounding, missing data and selection of the reported result. Of the randomised controlled trials that were evaluated with RoB2, only one was demonstrated to have low risk of bias,39 and the remaining 22 and one were found to be at moderate20,22,31,34,36,37,40,41,43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49,52,53,55,56,61,62,67 or high50 risk of bias, respectively (Fig. 3). Problems in the randomised controlled trials were predominantly found in the domains of randomisation process, deviations from the intended interventions, and selection of the reported result.Fig 2Risk of bias assessment of the observational studies using the ROBINS-I tool.5,21,23,24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30,32,35,38,54,58,60,63, 64, 65, 66,68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73 +, low risk; !, moderate risk; –, serious risk.Fig 2Fig 3Risk of bias assessment of the randomised controlled trials using the ROB 2 tool. +, low risk; !, some concerns; –, high risk.Fig 3

vational studies using the ROBINS-I tool.5,21,23,24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30,32,35,38,54,58,60,63, 64, 65, 66,68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73 +, low risk; !, moderate risk; –, serious risk.Fig 2Fig 3Risk of bias assessment of the randomised controlled trials using the ROB 2 tool. +, low risk; !, some concerns; –, high risk.Fig 3 Risk of bias assessment of the observational studies using the ROBINS-I tool.5,21,23,24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30,32,35,38,54,58,60,63, 64, 65, 66,68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73 +, low risk; !, moderate risk; –, serious risk. Risk of bias assessment of the randomised controlled trials using the ROB 2 tool. +, low risk; !, some concerns; –, high risk.

Risk of bias assessment of the observational studies using the ROBINS-I tool.5,21,23,24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30,32,35,38,54,58,60,63, 64, 65, 66,68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73 +, low risk; !, moderate risk; –, serious risk. Risk of bias assessment of the randomised controlled trials using the ROB 2 tool. +, low risk; !, some concerns; –, high risk. The characteristics and results of the studies have been detailed in Table 1. Ten different methods were used to objectively assess gastric emptying: gastric ultrasound (24)5,20,25,31,32,34,37, 38, 39, 40,42,47,48,51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56,59,68, 69, 70, 71; paracetamol absorption (20)20, 21, 22,24,26,27,30,31,35,36,41,43, 44, 45, 46,50,60, 61, 62,66; nasogastric sampling with (2)49,64 and without dye dilution (3)25,58,67; breath hydrogen analysis (4)28,32,63,72; epigastric impedance (2)65,73; barium X-ray (1)33; breath 13C-octanoic acid analysis (1)29; electrogastrography (1)57; and radiotelemetry pH pill (1).23 Five studies utilised more than one of these methods20,25,31,32,69 and one investigated gastric emptying by using gastric ultrasound with scintigraphy.69 Studies varied in relation to the nature of what was consumed by the patient to evaluate gastric emptying. In 24 studies, they had drugs and liquids,20, 21, 22, 23, 24,26, 27, 28,31,32,35,36,41,43,45,46,50,60, 61, 62, 63,65,66,72 in 17, liquids alone,25,33,34,37, 38, 39,42,44,49,51, 52, 53, 54,59,64,67,73 in eight, liquids and solids,5,30,32,40,47,48,58,70 in three, solids alone,29,68,71 in two, drugs, liquids, and solids,30,69 and in one, no drugs, liquids or solids.57Table 1Characteristics of the included trials. All Caesarean deliveries were elective unless otherwise stated. Differences only reported as significant if P<0.05.

liquids and solids,5,30,32,40,47,48,58,70 in three, solids alone,29,68,71 in two, drugs, liquids, and solids,30,69 and in one, no drugs, liquids or solids.57Table 1Characteristics of the included trials. All Caesarean deliveries were elective unless otherwise stated. Differences only reported as significant if P<0.05. CSA, cross-sectional area; OCTT, orocaecal transit time; RLSR, right lateral semirecumbent; T1, first trimester; T2, second trimester; T3, third trimester; US, ultrasound.Table 1ReferenceGroup (n)Type of publicationConstituents of groupsMethodologyDrug, liquids, solids, or bothConditions or interventions if applicableRelevant findingsPregnancyWong et al., 200220Pregnant (T3) (11)Cross-over studyBMI <35 kg m−2Gastric US (9) and paracetamol absorption (11)Drug and liquidsFollowing an overnight fast, ingestion of paracetamol 1.5 g with water 50 or 300 ml on two occasions separated by at least 2 daysBlood sampling then performed every 10–30 min for 1–2.5 h and gastric US in semirecumbent position at 45 degrees every 10 min for 1 h or until stomach emptyGastric half emptying time decreased with water 300 ml (24 [sd 6] min) compared with 50 ml (33 [8] min)Time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration reduced with water 300 ml (40.9 [19.2] min) compared with 50 ml (24.6 [12.1] min)No difference in area under plasma paracetamol curve at 1 h or peak plasma paracetamol concentration between water 50 and 300 mlWong et al., 200731Pregnant (T3) (10)Cross-over studyBMI >35 kg m−2Gastric US and paracetamol absorptionDrug and liquidsFollowing an overnight fast, ingestion of paracetamol 1.5 g with water 50 or 300 ml on two occasions separated by at least 2 daysBlood sampling then performed every 10–30 min for 1–2 h and gastric US in semirecumbent position at 45 degrees every 10 min for 1 h or until stomach emptyNo difference in area under plasma paracetamol curve, peak plasma paracetamol concentration or time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration between water 50 and 300 mlSutanto et al., 201242Pregnant (T3) (9)Cross-sectional study–Gastric USLiquidsFollowing a fast of 2 h for clear liquids and 6 h for solids, ingestion of liquid formula 200 ml (carbohydrate 62%, fat 20%, and protein 18% with total of 200 kcal)Gastric US then performed in an unspecified position every 30 min for 2 hPreingestion gastric volume averaged 41.8 [18.7] mlAll patients had a gastric volume of <80 ml in <2 hIrwin et al., 202053Pregnant (T3) (50)Randomised controlled trialTea with milk (25)Water (25)Ga

, fat 20%, and protein 18% with total of 200 kcal)Gastric US then performed in an unspecified position every 30 min for 2 hPreingestion gastric volume averaged 41.8 [18.7] mlAll patients had a gastric volume of <80 ml in <2 hIrwin et al., 202053Pregnant (T3) (50)Randomised controlled trialTea with milk (25)Water (25)Ga stric USLiquidsFollowing a fast of at least 2 h for clear fluids, 6 h for light meal and 8 h for fatty meal, ingestion of tea with milk 200 ml or water 250 mlGastric US then performed in RLSR and semirecumbent position at 45 degrees every 15 min for 2 hNo difference in gastric antral CSA and total gastric fluid volume at 2 h between tea with milk and waterDavison et al., 197064Pregnant (T3) (11)Labour (8)Nonpregnant (11)Cross-sectional study–Nasogastric sampling and dye dilutionLiquidsFollowing gastric content aspiration, ingestion of water 750 ml that contained phenol red 30 μg ml−1 1 h laterNasogastric sampling then performed every 10 minNo difference in gastric half emptying time or volume remaining in stomach at 30 min between T3 and nonpregnantCarp et al., 199270Pregnant (T3) (34)Labour (39)Nonpregnant (20)Cross-sectional studyPregnant:Standard meal (20)Unspecified solid food (14)Nonpregnant:Standard meal (20)Gastric USLiquids and solidsFollowing an overnight fast, ingestion of a standard meal 800 gGastric US then performed in RLSR at 45 degrees or semirecumbent position every 2 hFollowing an unspecified fast, ingestion of unspecified solid foodGastric US in an unspecified position then performed once at varying time intervalsNo food detected in stomach at 4 h in T3 and nonpregnantBouvet et al., 202271Pregnant (T3) (10)Labour (20)Nonpregnant (10)Cross-sectional study–Gastric USSolidsFollowing a fast of at least 1 h for clear fluids and 6 h for solids, ingestion of a standard meal (carbohydrate 21.2 g, fat 2.2 g and protein 3.8 g with a total of 120 kcal)Gastric US then performed in semirecumbent position at 45 degrees at 15 min and 1, 1.5, and 2 hNo difference in gastric half emptying time between T3 and nonpregnantLawson et al., 198572Pregnant (T1–3) (42)Postpartum (17)Prospective cohort studyPregnant:T1 (8)T2 (12)T3 (22)Breath hydrogen analysisDrug and liquidsFollowing an overnight fast, ingestion of lactulose 10 g with water 100 mlBreath sampling then performed every 15 min for 4 hOCTT increased with progression of pregnancy (T1 99 [39] vs T2 125 [48] vs T3 137 [58] min)O'Sullivan et al., 198773Pregnant (T3) (18)Postpartum (15)Nonpregnant (13)Cross-secti

sisDrug and liquidsFollowing an overnight fast, ingestion of lactulose 10 g with water 100 mlBreath sampling then performed every 15 min for 4 hOCTT increased with progression of pregnancy (T1 99 [39] vs T2 125 [48] vs T3 137 [58] min)O'Sullivan et al., 198773Pregnant (T3) (18)Postpartum (15)Nonpregnant (13)Cross-secti onal study–Epigastric impedanceLiquidsFollowing a fast of at least 4 h, ingestion of water or diluted orange concentrate 500 mlElectrical impedance then measured through electrodes on the epigastriumNo difference in gastric half emptying time between T3 and nonpregnantWhitehead et al., 199321Pregnant (T1–3) (64)Postpartum (55)Nonpregnant (32)Prospective cohort studyPregnant:T1 (18)T2 (10)T3 (36)Paracetamol absorptionDrug and liquidsFollowing a fast of least 4 h, ingestion of paracetamol 1.5 g with water 50 mlBlood sampling then performed every 10–30 min for 2 hNo difference in area under plasma paracetamol curve at 2 h, peak plasma paracetamol concentration, or time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration between T1, T2, T3, and nonpregnantClark et al., 198322Pregnant (T1) (30)Nonpregnant (30)Randomised controlled trialPregnant and nonpregnant:No premedication (10)Atropine 300 μg (10)Glycopyrrolate 600 μg (10)Paracetamol absorptionDrug and liquidsFollowing a fast of at least 6 h, ingestion of paracetamol 500 mg with water 12.5 mlBlood sampling then performed every 15–30 min for 2 hIn the presence of no premedication, area under plasma paracetamol curve at 1 h decreased in T1 (44.7 [12.2] μg ml−1 h−1) compared with nonpregnant (53.7 [16.5] μg ml−1 h−1)In the context of pregnancy, area under plasma paracetamol curve at 1 h reduced by glycopyrrolate (20.7 [10.7] μg ml−1 h−1) compared with no premedication (44.7 [12.2] μg ml−1 h−1) and atropine (35.8 [14.2] μg ml−1 h−1)O'Sullivan et al., 198423Pregnant (T3) (23)Nonpregnant (11)Nonrandomised controlled studyPregnant:Magnesium trisilicate (12)Sodium citrate (11)Nonpregnant:Sodium citrate (11)Radiotelemetry pH pillDrug and liquidsFollowing an overnight fast, ingestion of pH pill with water 15–20 ml and subsequent antacid 15 mlContinuous pH then measured while within the stomachNo difference in gastric half emptying time or pH pill transit time between T3 and nonpregnant with the same antacidNo difference in gastric half emptying time between sodium citrate and magnesium trisilicate in T3Simpson et al., 198824Pregnant (T1) (28)Nonpregnant (14)Cross-sectional studyPregnant:8–11 weeks' gestation (16)12–14 weeks' gestatio

lf emptying time or pH pill transit time between T3 and nonpregnant with the same antacidNo difference in gastric half emptying time between sodium citrate and magnesium trisilicate in T3Simpson et al., 198824Pregnant (T1) (28)Nonpregnant (14)Cross-sectional studyPregnant:8–11 weeks' gestation (16)12–14 weeks' gestatio n (12)Paracetamol absorptionDrug and liquidsFollowing a fast of least 4 h, ingestion of paracetamol 1.5 g with water 150 mlBlood sampling then performed every 15–30 min for 2 hArea under plasma paracetamol curve at 1 h decreased in 12–14 weeks' pregnant (10.5 [5.9] μg ml−1 h−1) compared with nonpregnant (19.3 [7.1] μg ml−1 h−1)Peak plasma paracetamol concentration reduced in 12–14 weeks' pregnant (21.4 [7.6] μg ml−1) compared with nonpregnant (34.4 [16.1] μg ml−1)Time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration increased in 12–14 weeks' pregnant (71.9 [31.9] min) compared with nonpregnant (45 [22.1] min)Rådberg et al., 198925Pregnant (T3) (14)Nonpregnant (16)Cross-sectional studyNasogastric sampling:Pregnant (5)Nonpregnant (7)Gastric US and nasogastric samplingLiquidsFollowing an overnight fast, ingestion of liquid formula 300 ml (carbohydrate 17 g, fat 5 g, and protein 5 g)Gastric US then performed in erect position using the sum of cylinders method every 15 min for 1.75 h before nasogastric sampling in some patients for nitrogen analysisNo difference in final gastric volume compared with the starting volume or residual gastric protein content at 1.75 h between T3 and nonpregnantMacfie et al., 199126Pregnant (T1–3) (45)Nonpregnant (15)Cross-sectional studyPregnant:T1 (15)T2 (15)T3 (15)Paracetamol absorptionDrug and liquidsFollowing a fast of at least 6 h, ingestion of paracetamol 1.5 g with water 50 mlBlood sampling then performed every 15–30 min for 2 hArea under plasma paracetamol curve at 1 h decreased in T1 (8.8 [1.5] μg ml−1 h−1) compared with nonpregnant (14 [1.5] μg ml−1 h−1)No difference in area under plasma paracetamol curve at 1 h between T2 or T3 and nonpregnantNo difference in peak plasma paracetamol concentration or time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration between T1, T2, T3 and nonpregnantLevy et al., 199427Pregnant (T1) (20)Nonpregnant (20)Cross-sectional study–Paracetamol absorptionDrug and liquidsFollowing a fast of at least 4 h, ingestion of paracetamol 1.5 g with water 50 mlBlood sampling then performed every 15 min for 2 hArea under plasma paracetamol curve at 1 h decreased in T1 (10.6 [5.5] μg ml−1 h−1) compared with nonpregnant (17.9 [8.

gnant (20)Cross-sectional study–Paracetamol absorptionDrug and liquidsFollowing a fast of at least 4 h, ingestion of paracetamol 1.5 g with water 50 mlBlood sampling then performed every 15 min for 2 hArea under plasma paracetamol curve at 1 h decreased in T1 (10.6 [5.5] μg ml−1 h−1) compared with nonpregnant (17.9 [8. 9] μg ml−1 h−1)Peak plasma paracetamol concentration reduced in T1 (3.3 [7.5] μg ml−1) compared with nonpregnant (29.9 [11.5] μg ml−1)Time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration increased in T1 (69.0 [29.0] min) compared with nonpregnant (48.0 [28.2] min)Szilagyi et al., 199628Pregnant (T1–2) (30)Nonpregnant after postpartum (27)Nonpregnant (17)Prospective cohort studyNonpregnant after postpartum: 3–14 months following neonatal deliveryBreath hydrogen analysisDrug and liquidsFollowing an overnight fast, ingestion of lactulose 10 g with water 100 mlBreath sampling then performed every 10 min for 3 hOCTT increased in pregnant (99.2 [7.8] min) compared with nonpregnant after postpartum (68.5 [6.4] min) and nonpregnant (63.5 [8.7] min)Maes et al., 199929Pregnant (T1) (24)Nonpregnant (43)Case control studyPregnant:No previous hyperemesis gravidarum (10)Recovered hyperemesis gravidarum (14)Breath 13C-octanoic acid analysisSolidsFollowing an overnight fast, ingestion of a standard meal 60 g (containing 13C-octanoic acid 91 mg and total of 250 kcal) with water 150 mlBreath sampling then performed every 15 min for 4 hGastric half emptying time decreased in T1 recovered from hyperemesis gravidarum (62 [20.7] min) compared with T1 without previous hyperemesis (94 [21.5] min)No difference in gastric half emptying time between T1 recovered from hyperemesis gravidarum, T1 without previous hyperemesis and nonpregnantBarboni et al., 20165Pregnant (T3) (10)Nonpregnant (10)Case control study–Gastric USLiquids and solidsFollowing a fast of at least 6 h, ingestion of a standard meal (carbohydrate 55 g, fat 10 g, and protein 35 g with a total of 450 kcal) with water 300 mlGastric US then performed in RLSR at 45 degrees at 10 min and 1.5 and 4 hChange in gastric antral CSA at 10–90 min was decreased in T3 (–270 [320] mm2) compared with nonpregnant (–500 [640] mm2)Change in gastric antral CSA at 1.5–4 h was reduced in T3 (–440 [300] mm2) compared with nonpregnant (–500 [690] mm2)Stanley et al., 199530Pregnant (T1–3) (29)Nonpregnant after postpartum (10)Prospective cohort studyPregnant:T1 (10)T2 (9)T3 (10)Nonpregnant after postpartum: 8 weeks following neonatal deliveryParacetamol ab

ge in gastric antral CSA at 1.5–4 h was reduced in T3 (–440 [300] mm2) compared with nonpregnant (–500 [690] mm2)Stanley et al., 199530Pregnant (T1–3) (29)Nonpregnant after postpartum (10)Prospective cohort studyPregnant:T1 (10)T2 (9)T3 (10)Nonpregnant after postpartum: 8 weeks following neonatal deliveryParacetamol ab sorptionDrug, liquids and solidsFollowing an 8-h fast, ingestion of a standard meal (carbohydrate 59 g, fat 21.2 g, and protein 17.9 g) with water 200 ml and subsequent paracetamol 1.5 g with water 50 mlBlood sampling then performed every 20 min for 2.7 hNo difference in peak plasma paracetamol concentration or time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration between T1, T2, T3, and nonpregnant after postpartumChiloiro et al., 200132Pregnant (T1 and 3) (11)Nonpregnant after postpartum (11)Prospective cohort studyNonpregnant after postpartum:4–6 months following neonatal deliveryBreath hydrogen analysis and gastric USDrug and liquidsFollowing an overnight fast, ingestion of lactulose 18 g with water 180 mlBreath sampling then performed every 10 min for up to 6 h and gastric US in erect position every 10 min until stomach emptyOCTT increased in T3 (100 [95% IQR 50.5–240] min) compared with nonpregnant after postpartum (70 [95% IQR 0.5–240] min)No difference in gastric emptying between T1, T3, and nonpregnant after postpartumCaesarean deliveryCarbohydrate drinkPopivanov et al., 202051Caesarean delivery (40)Prospective cohort study–Gastric USLiquidsFollowing a fast of 2 h for clear fluids, 6 h for light meal, and 8 h for fatty meal or meat, ingestion of carbohydrate drink 400 ml (carbohydrate 40 g) up to 2 h before Caesarean deliveryGastric US then performed in RLSR at 45 degrees and supine position before ingestion and every 20 min for 2 h subsequent to ingestionNo solid food detected in gastric antrum and Perlas grade was 0 and 1 in 80% and 20% of patients, respectively, before ingestionPerlas grade at 1.7 h was 0 and 1 in 77.5% and 22.5% of patients, respectively, following ingestionNo difference in gastric antral CSA before ingestion and subsequent to ingestion at 2 hShi et al., 202152Caesarean delivery (75)Randomised controlled trialFasted (25)Carbohydrate drink (25)Water (25)Gastric USLiquidsFollowing a 6-h fast, fasting continued for 2 h or ingestion of carbohydrate drink 300 ml or water 300 ml 2 h before Caesarean deliveryGastric US then performed in supine position before ingestion, subsequent to ingestion, and 2 h thereafterNo difference in gastric antral CSA

ydrate drink (25)Water (25)Gastric USLiquidsFollowing a 6-h fast, fasting continued for 2 h or ingestion of carbohydrate drink 300 ml or water 300 ml 2 h before Caesarean deliveryGastric US then performed in supine position before ingestion, subsequent to ingestion, and 2 h thereafterNo difference in gastric antral CSA at baseline and 2 h between carbohydrate drink and waterLiu et al., 202354Caesarean delivery (90)Randomised controlled trialWater (45)Carbohydrate drink (45)Gastric USLiquidsFollowing a fast of at least 2 h for clear fluids, 6 h for light meal, and 8 h for fatty meal, combined spinal epidural with intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine 0.5%, 3 ml and, if needed, epidural lidocaine 2% for Caesarean deliverySubsequent to arrival to recovery, ingestion of carbohydrate drink 100 ml (carbohydrate 10 g) or water 10 mlGastric US then performed in RLSR at 45 degrees before ingestion and at 5 and 30 min and 1, 1.5, and 2 h subsequent to ingestionGastric fullness if gastric antral CSA >1030 mm2Gastric antral CSA increased at 30 min with carbohydrate drink (1070 [270] mm2) compared with water (780 [150] mm2) after Caesarean deliveryGastric antral CSA increased at 1 h with carbohydrate drink (810 [200] mm2) compared with water (620 [130] mm2) following Caesarean deliveryNo difference in gastric antral CSA at 1.5 and 2 h between water and carbohydrate subsequent to Caesarean delivery13.3%, 6.7%, and 2.2% of patients had gastric fullness at 1, 1.5, and 2 h, respectivelyMiscellaneous drugsMurphy et al., 198436Labour (80)Caesarean delivery (40)Randomised controlled trialCaesarean delivery:No metoclopramide (20)Metoclopramide (20)Paracetamol absorptionDrug and liquidsPatients in Caesarean delivery group received aluminium hydroxide 30 ml before induction of unspecified anaesthesiaFollowing a fast of at least 2 h, ingestion of paracetamol 1.5 g with water 200 mlBlood sampling then performed at 1 hPlasma paracetamol concentration at 1 h decreased in Caesarean delivery without metoclopramide (13.6 [6.5] μg ml−1) compared with Caesarean delivery with metoclopramide (17.9 [4.7] μg ml−1Elsawy et al., 202355Caesarean delivery (60)Randomised controlled trialNo granisetron (30)Granisteron (30)Gastric USDrugFollowing a 6–8-h fast, gastric US performed in RLSR at 45 degrees 1 h before Caesarean deliverySubsequent to no granisetron or granisetron, gastric US then repeated in RLSR at 45 degrees 1 h laterGastric antral CSA decreased at 1 h (400 [120] mm2) with granisetron but not no granisetron co

ranisteron (30)Gastric USDrugFollowing a 6–8-h fast, gastric US performed in RLSR at 45 degrees 1 h before Caesarean deliverySubsequent to no granisetron or granisetron, gastric US then repeated in RLSR at 45 degrees 1 h laterGastric antral CSA decreased at 1 h (400 [120] mm2) with granisetron but not no granisetron co mpared with baseline (480 [140] mm2)Gastric volume reduced at 1 h (50 [19] ml) with granisetron but not no granisetron compared with baseline (70 [24] ml)Hamed et al., 202356Caesarean delivery (111)Randomised controlled trialNo metoclopramide (55)Metoclopramide (56)Gastric USDrugFollowing a 7-h fast, gastric US performed in RLSR and supine position at 45 degrees 1 h before Caesarean deliverySubsequent to no metoclopramide or metoclopramide, gastric US then repeated in RLSR and supine position at 45 degrees 1 h laterGastric antral CSA decreased at 1 h (520 [120] mm2) with metoclopramide but not no metoclopramide compared with baseline (760 [130] mm2)Gastric volume reduced at 1 h (69 [19] ml) with metoclopramide but not no metoclopramide compared with baseline (104 [19] ml)Perlas grade was 2 in 7.1% of patients who had metoclopramide compared with 46.2% of patients who had not had metoclopramideRegional anaesthesiaOshima et al., 200957Caesarean delivery (16)Postpartum (16)Prospective cohort study–ElectrogastrographyNoneFollowing an overnight fast, combined spinal epidural with intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%, 2 ml and fentanyl 10 μg and, if needed, epidural ropivacaine 0.375% for Caesarean deliveryElectrogastrography then performed 10 min before and 10 and 20 min subsequent to combined spinal epidural, 10 min before end of Caesarean delivery and on postoperative day 7Dominant frequency of electrogastrography at 10 min and 20 min following combined spinal epidural and 10 min before end of Caesarean delivery increased compared with baselineElectrogastrography at postoperative day 7 increased compared with baseline, 10 min, and 20 min subsequent to combined spinal epidural and 10 min before end of Caesarean deliveryGeneral anaesthesiaLewis et al., 198758Caesarean delivery (40)Prospective cohort studyFasted (20)Liquids (9)Liquids and solids (11)Nasogastric samplingLiquids and solidsFollowing an overnight fast, ingestion of magnesium trisilicate 20 mlPatients then given no liquids or solids, tea, or tea and toast up to 4 h before Caesarean deliveryGeneral anaesthesia with thiopentone 5 mg kg−1 and suxamethonium 100 mg for Caesarean deliverySubsequent to neonata

asogastric samplingLiquids and solidsFollowing an overnight fast, ingestion of magnesium trisilicate 20 mlPatients then given no liquids or solids, tea, or tea and toast up to 4 h before Caesarean deliveryGeneral anaesthesia with thiopentone 5 mg kg−1 and suxamethonium 100 mg for Caesarean deliverySubsequent to neonata l delivery, they received fentanyl 200 μg and nasogastric aspiration then performedGastric aspirate volume with liquids (73.4 [52.7] ml) or liquids and solids (64.5 [21.5] ml) increased compared with fasted (33.2 [22] ml)LabourLabour in absence of or without specified epiduralHirsheimer et al., 198333Labour (10)Cross-sectional studyUnspecified analgesiaBarium X-rayLiquidsFollowing an unspecified fast, ingestion of barium 170 mlX-ray then performed every h for 4 hGastric emptying delayed in 20% of patients based on barium distribution on serial X-raysNascimento et al., 201934Labour (54)Randomised controlled trialMaltodextrin (18)Coffee with milk (18)Orange juice (18)Unspecified analgesiaGastric USLiquidsFollowing a fast of least 2 h for clear fluids, 4 h for light meal and 6–8 h for high fat or protein meal, ingestion of coffee with milk, maltodextrin or orange juice, all 450 ml and with a total of 200 kcalGastric US performed in RLSR at 45 degrees before ingestion and then at 5 min and every 30 min for 2 hGastric emptying of coffee with milk and orange juice decreased compared with maltodextrin in labourNo difference in gastric emptying between coffee with milk and orange juiceNo patient who received maltodextrin had an estimated gastric volume >1.5 ml kg−1 at 1.5 h or a gastric antral CSA greater at 1.5 h compared with baseline in labourDavison et al., 197064Pregnant (T3) (11)Labour (8)Nonpregnant (11)Cross-sectional studyLabour:Unspecified analgesiaNasogastric sampling and dye dilutionLiquidsFollowing gastric content aspiration, ingestion of water 750 ml containing phenol red 30 μg ml−1 1 h laterNasogastric sampling then performed every 10 minGastric volume at 30 min increased in labour (393 [126.1] ml) compared with T3 (274.8 [115.1] ml) and nonpregnant (186 [96.5] ml)Influence of different analgesic strategies excluding epiduralNimmo et al., 197535Labour (46)Postpartum (10)Cross-sectional studyLabour:No opioid (12)IM diamorphine 10 mg (8)IM diamorphine 10 mg and metoclopramide 10 mg (5)I.M.

n labour (393 [126.1] ml) compared with T3 (274.8 [115.1] ml) and nonpregnant (186 [96.5] ml)Influence of different analgesic strategies excluding epiduralNimmo et al., 197535Labour (46)Postpartum (10)Cross-sectional studyLabour:No opioid (12)IM diamorphine 10 mg (8)IM diamorphine 10 mg and metoclopramide 10 mg (5)I.M. pentazocine 60 mg (8)I.M. meperidine 150 mg (8)I.M. meperidine 150 mg and metoclopramide 10 mg (5)Paracetamol absorptionDrug and liquidsFollowing a fast of at least 4 h and a variable period following opioid, ingestion of paracetamol 1.5 g with water 200 mlBlood sampling then performed every 15 min for 1.5 h and subsequently every 1–2 h up to 8 hPlasma paracetamol concentration decreased at 1 h with pentazocine in labour (2 [1.5] μg) compared with no opioid in labour (18.7 [4.6] μg)Peak plasma paracetamol concentration reduced with meperidine (14 [8.3] μg ml−1) and diamorphine in labour (8.6 [4.6] μg ml−1) compared with no opioid in labour (21 [10.3] μg ml−1)Time to peak plasma paracetamol increased with meperidine (4 h) and diamorphine in labour (4 h) compared with no opioid in labour (30 min)Inhibitory effect of diamorphine and meperidine on gastric emptying in labour not reversed by metoclopramideMurphy et al., 198436Labour (80)Caesarean delivery (40)Randomised controlled trialLabour without opioid:No metoclopramide (20)Metoclopramide (20)Labour with opioid:No metoclopramide (20)Metoclopramide (20)Caesarean delivery:No metoclopramide (20)Metoclopramide (20)Paracetamol absorptionDrug and liquidsPatients in labour opioid group given i.m.

ur (80)Caesarean delivery (40)Randomised controlled trialLabour without opioid:No metoclopramide (20)Metoclopramide (20)Labour with opioid:No metoclopramide (20)Metoclopramide (20)Caesarean delivery:No metoclopramide (20)Metoclopramide (20)Paracetamol absorptionDrug and liquidsPatients in labour opioid group given i.m. meperidine 50 mgThose in caesarean delivery group received aluminium hydroxide 30 ml before induction of unspecified anaesthesiaFollowing a fast of at least 2 h, ingestion of paracetamol 1.5 g with water 200 mlBlood sampling then performed at 1 hPlasma paracetamol concentration at 1 h decreased in labour with opioid (6.4 [8.4] μg ml−1) compared with labour without opioid (9.4 [6.6] μg ml−1), and reduced in labour without opioid (9.4 [6.6] μg ml−1) relative to Caesarean delivery (13.6 [6.5] μg ml−1)Plasma paracetamol concentration at 1 h decreased in Caesarean delivery without metoclopramide (13.6 [6.5] μg ml−1) compared with Caesarean delivery with metoclopramide (17.9 [4.7] μg ml−1), reduced in labour without metoclopramide (9.4 [6.5] μg ml−1 relative to labour with metoclopramide (15.9 [5.6] μg ml−1), and decreased in labour with opioid (6.4 [8.4] μg ml−1) compared with labour with opioid and metoclopramide (11.5 [5.7] μg ml−1)Influence of epiduralCarp et al., 199270Pregnant (T3) (34)Labour (39)Nonpregnant (20)Cross-sectional studyPregnant (T3):Standard meal (20)Unspecified solid food (14)Labour:Epidural bupivacaine alone and unspecified solid food (39)Nonpregnant:Standard meal (20)Gastric USLiquids and solidsFollowing an overnight fast, ingestion of a standard meal 800 g and unrestricted clear fluidsGastric US then performed in RLSR at 45 degrees or semirecumbent position every 2 hFollowing an unspecified fast, ingestion of unspecified solid food and unrestricted clear fluidsGastric US in an unspecified position then performed once at varying time intervalsFollowing a variable fast in labour, patients received epidural bupivacaine 0.25%, 10 mlGastric US then performed in RLSR at 45 degrees once within 1 h of epidural placementSolid food detected at 0–24 h in stomach of 71.8% of patients in labour with epidural bupivacaine alone, independent of the time from last oral intake, compared with no solid food present at 4 h in stomach in T3 and nonpregnantVallejo et al., 201337Labour (156)Randomised controlled trialProtein (72)Water (84)Gastric USLiquidsFollowing a fast of at least 4 h, patients given epidural bupivacaine 0.08%, 8 ml with fentanyl 100 μg and subsequ

he time from last oral intake, compared with no solid food present at 4 h in stomach in T3 and nonpregnantVallejo et al., 201337Labour (156)Randomised controlled trialProtein (72)Water (84)Gastric USLiquidsFollowing a fast of at least 4 h, patients given epidural bupivacaine 0.08%, 8 ml with fentanyl 100 μg and subsequ ently received bupivacaine 0.08% with fentanyl 2 μg ml−1 as a continuous infusion at 8 ml h−1 with patient-controlled epidural boluses of 8 mlPatients ingested protein drink 325 ml (protein 30 g and sugar 1 g with a total of 160 kcal) and water or water aloneGastric US performed in RLSR at 45 degrees before and after ingestion and then every 10 min for 2 hNo difference in gastric half emptying time or incidence of nausea and vomiting between labour with protein and labour with waterBataille et al., 201438Pregnant (T3) (6)Labour (60)Prospective cohort study–Gastric USLiquidsFollowing an unspecified fast, patients given epidural ropivacaine 0.1%, 10 ml with sufentanil 0.5 μg ml−1 and subsequently received ropivacaine 0.1%, with sufentanil 0.5 μg ml−1 as a continuous infusion at 5 ml h−1 with patient-controlled epidural boluses of 5 mlGastric US performed in semirecumbent position at 45 degrees at time of epidural request and once cervix fully dilatedIn T3, median antral CSA was 90 mm2 following an overnight fast and 409 mm2 subsequent to ingestion of liquids, justifying use of 320 mm2 as the cut-off value for a stomach at riskGastric antral CSA increased in labour at time of epidural request (319 [77.8] mm2) compared with full cervical dilation (203 [34.5] mm2)Incidence of gastric antral CSA >320 mm2 increased in labour at time of epidural request (50%) compared with full cervical dilatation (13%)Rousset et al., 202039Labour (125)Randomised controlled trialFasted (62)Fluids (63)Gastric USLiquidsPatients given epidural and patient-controlled epidural boluses of ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 0.5 μg ml−1Patients remained fasted or received apple juice up to 400 mlGastric US then performed in semirecumbent position at 45 degrees at baseline and full cervical dilatation or 1.5 hEmpty stomach if gastric antral CSA <300 mm2No difference in incidence of patients with empty stomach between fasted and fluids in labourBouvet et al., 202271Pregnant (T3) (10)Labour (20)Nonpregnant (10)Cross-sectional studyNo epidural (10)Epidural ropivacaine and opioid (10)Gastric USSolidsFollowing a fast of at least 1 h for clear fluids and 6 h for solids, ingestion of a standard meal (carb

tients with empty stomach between fasted and fluids in labourBouvet et al., 202271Pregnant (T3) (10)Labour (20)Nonpregnant (10)Cross-sectional studyNo epidural (10)Epidural ropivacaine and opioid (10)Gastric USSolidsFollowing a fast of at least 1 h for clear fluids and 6 h for solids, ingestion of a standard meal (carb ohydrate 21.2 g, fat 2.2 g, and protein 3.8 g with a total of 120 kcal)Standard meal ingested 1 h subsequent to initiation of epidural analgesia and patients received epidural ropivacaine 0.1% with sufentanil 0.25 μg ml−1 as a continuous infusion at 3 ml h−1 with patient-controlled epidural boluses of 5 mlGastric US then performed in RLSR at 45 degrees at 15 min and 1, 1.5, and 2 hGastric half emptying time of labour without epidural not calculatedGastric half emptying time increased in labour with epidural ropivacaine and opioid (72 [56.3] min) compared with T3 (35 [20] min) and nonpregnant (43 [23.7] min)Gastric emptying fraction at 1 h decreased in labour without epidural (4% [3.7%]) or with epidural ropivacaine and opioid (9% [11.1%]) compared with T3 (34% [22.2%]) and nonpregnant (27% [15.6%])Gastric emptying fraction at 1.5 h reduced in labour without epidural (7% [3.7%]) compared with labour with epidural ropivacaine and opioid (31% [16.3%]), T3 (45% [18.5%]) and nonpregnant (52% [11.1%])Liu et al., 2 202340Labour (120)Prospective cohort studyEpidural ropivacaine and opioid (90)Nonpharmacological methods of analgesia, intravenous midazolam with fentanyl, or both (30)Gastric USLiquids and solidsFollowing the need for analgesia, ingestion of a standard meal (carbohydrate 72.7 g, fat 15.7 g and protein 11.6 g with a total of 70 kcal) and water 300 ml before provision of pain reliefGastric US then performed in RLSR at 45 degrees subsequent to ingestion and before analgesia and at 1 and 2 hNo difference in gastric antral CSA and gastric emptying at 1 h and 2 h between labour with epidural ropivacaine and opioid and labour with nonpharmacological methods of analgesia and/or intravenous midazolam with fentanylInfluence of epidural constituentsWright et al., 199241Labour (30)Randomised controlled trialEpidural bupivacaine alone (15)Epidural bupivacaine and opioid (15)Paracetamol absorptionDrug and liquidsFollowing a fast of at least 4 h, patients received epidural bupivacaine 0.375%, 10 ml or bupivacaine 0.375%, 10 ml with fentanyl 100 μg and subsequent bupivacaine 0.375%, 8 ml on request15 min later, ingestion of paracetamol 1.5 g with water 100 mlBlood sampling

ine and opioid (15)Paracetamol absorptionDrug and liquidsFollowing a fast of at least 4 h, patients received epidural bupivacaine 0.375%, 10 ml or bupivacaine 0.375%, 10 ml with fentanyl 100 μg and subsequent bupivacaine 0.375%, 8 ml on request15 min later, ingestion of paracetamol 1.5 g with water 100 mlBlood sampling then performed every 15–30 min for 3 hPeak plasma paracetamol concentration decreased in labour with epidural bupivacaine and opioid (18 [3.3] μg ml−1) compared with labour with epidural bupivacaine alone (27 [11.3] μg ml−1)Time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration increased in labour with epidural bupivacaine and opioid (75 [36.6] min) compared with labour with epidural bupivacaine alone (60 [50.1] min)No difference in area under plasma paracetamol curve at 1 h between labour with epidural bupivacaine alone and labour with epidural bupivacaine and opioidEwah et al., 199343Labour (36)Randomised controlled trialEpidural lower concentration bupivacaine alone (4)Epidural lower concentration bupivacaine and higher dose fentanyl (4)Epidural lower concentration bupivacaine and higher dose diamorphine (4)Epidural higher concentration bupivacaine alone (8)Epidural higher concentration bupivacaine and lower dose fentanyl (8)Epidural higher concentration bupivacaine and lower dose diamorphine (8)Paracetamol absorptionDrug and liquidsFollowing an unspecified fast, patients received epidural bupivacaine 0.25%, 10 ml and subsequent bupivacaine 0.125% or 0.25%, 10 ml with fentanyl 50 or 100 μg or diamorphine 2.5 or 5 mg30 min later, ingestion of paracetamol 1.5 gBlood sampling then performed every 15 min for 1.5 hPeak plasma paracetamol concentration decreased in labour with lower concentration bupivacaine and higher dose diamorphine (6.4 [1.0] μg ml−1) compared with labour with lower concentration bupivacaine alone (24.4 [4.4] μg ml−1)Time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration increased in labour with higher concentration bupivacaine and lower dose fentanyl (75.6 [7.4] min) compared with labour with higher concentration bupivacaine alone (45.6 [5.6] min), increased in labour with lower concentration bupivacaine and higher dose fentanyl (90 [16.6] min) relative to labour with lower concentration bupivacaine alone (45.6 [5.6] min), and increased in labour with lower concentration bupivacaine and higher dose diamorphine (257.5 [20] min) compared with labour with lower concentration bupivacaine alone (45.6 [5.6] min)No difference in peak plasma paracetamol concentration

elative to labour with lower concentration bupivacaine alone (45.6 [5.6] min), and increased in labour with lower concentration bupivacaine and higher dose diamorphine (257.5 [20] min) compared with labour with lower concentration bupivacaine alone (45.6 [5.6] min)No difference in peak plasma paracetamol concentration or time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration between all other permutations of concentration of bupivacaine and dose of opioid in labourZimmermann et al., 199644Labour (28)Randomised controlled trialEpidural bupivacaine alone (14)Epidural bupivacaine and opioid (14)Paracetamol absorptionLiquidsFollowing an unspecified fast, patients given epidural bupivacaine 0.125%, 10 ml with or without fentanyl 50 μg and subsequently received bupivacaine 0.125% with or without fentanyl 2 μg ml−1 as a continuous infusion at 10 ml h−12 h later, ingestion of paracetamol 20 mg kg−1 with water 150 mlBlood sampling then performed every 15 min for 2.5 hNo difference in area under plasma paracetamol curve at 45 min or 1.5 h, peak plasma paracetamol concentration, or time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration between labour with epidural bupivacaine alone and labour with epidural bupivacaine and opioidKelly et al., 199745Labour (101)Randomised controlled trialEpidural higher concentration bupivacaine alone (33)Epidural lower concentration bupivacaine and opioid (34)Intrathecal bupivacaine and opioid (34)Paracetamol absorptionDrug and liquidsFollowing a fast of at least 3 h, patients received epidural bupivacaine 0.375%, 10 ml, bupivacaine 0.25%, 10 ml with fentanyl 50 μg or intrathecal bupivacaine 2.5 mg with fentanyl 25 μg15 min later, ingestion of paracetamol 1.5 g with water 100 mlBlood sampling then performed every 15–30 min for 1.5–2.5 hArea under plasma paracetamol curve at 1.5 h decreased in labour with intrathecal bupivacaine and opioid (430 [491] μg ml−1 min−1) compared with labour with epidural higher concentration bupivacaine alone (736 [504] μg ml−1 min−1) and labour with epidural lower concentration bupivacaine and opioid (672 [453] μg ml−1 min−1)Peak plasma paracetamol concentration reduced in labour with intrathecal bupivacaine and opioid (13.4 [8.8] μg ml−1) compared with labour with epidural lower concentration bupivacaine and opioid (17.9 [8.1] μg ml−1)Time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration increased in labour with intrathecal bupivacaine and opioid (120 [41.3] min) compared with labour with epidural higher concentration bupivacaine alone (90 [41.3] min

] μg ml−1) compared with labour with epidural lower concentration bupivacaine and opioid (17.9 [8.1] μg ml−1)Time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration increased in labour with intrathecal bupivacaine and opioid (120 [41.3] min) compared with labour with epidural higher concentration bupivacaine alone (90 [41.3] min ) and labour with epidural lower concentration bupivacaine and opioid (82.5 [41.3] min)Porter et al., 199746Labour (55)Randomised controlled trialEpidural higher concentration and lower volume bupivacaine alone (14)Epidural higher concentration and volume bupivacaine alone (13)Epidural lower concentration and volume bupivacaine and opioid (14)Epidural lower concentration and higher volume bupivacaine and opioid (14)Paracetamol absorptionDrug and liquidsFollowing an unspecified fast, patients given epidural bupivacaine 0.25%, 10–15 ml and subsequently received bupivacaine 0.0625% or 0.125% with or without fentanyl 2.5 μg ml−1 as a continuous infusion at 10–12 ml h−1Once 30 or 40–50 ml of epidural solution had been administered, ingestion of paracetamol 1.5 g with unspecified volume of waterBlood sampling then performed every 15–30 min for 1.5 hTime to peak plasma paracetamol concentration increased in labour with epidural lower concentration and higher volume bupivacaine and opioid (76.1 [23.9] min) compared with epidural higher concentration and volume bupivacaine alone (54.2 [27.8] min)No difference in area under plasma paracetamol concentration curve, peak plasma paracetamol concentration, and time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration between all other permutations of concentration and volume of bupivacaine with or without opioidFiszer et al., 202247Labour (80)Randomised controlled trialEpidural bupivacaine and lower dose opioid (40)Epidural bupivacaine and higher dose opioid (40)Gastric USLiquids and solidsNo restriction on oral intakePatients given epidural bupivacaine 0.1%, 10 ml with fentanyl 25 or 100 μg and subsequently received bupivacaine 0.083%, with fentanyl 1 or 2 μg ml−1 as a continuous infusion at 6 ml h−1 with patient-controlled epidural boluses of 5 mlGastric US of performed in semirecumbent position at 45 degrees at 0 and 2 hNo difference in gastric antral CSA between 0 and 2 h for labour with epidural bupivacaine and lower dose opioid and labour with epidural bupivacaine and higher dose opioidNo difference in gastric antral CSA at 2 h between labour with epidural bupivacaine and lower dose opioid and labour with epidural bupivacaine and hi

o difference in gastric antral CSA between 0 and 2 h for labour with epidural bupivacaine and lower dose opioid and labour with epidural bupivacaine and higher dose opioidNo difference in gastric antral CSA at 2 h between labour with epidural bupivacaine and lower dose opioid and labour with epidural bupivacaine and hi gher dose opioid, regardless of fasting statusCarbohydrate drinkNi et al., 202448Labour (40)Randomised controlled trialCarbohydrate drink (20)High energy semifluid solid drink (20)Gastric USLiquids and solidsFollowing a fast of at least 2 h for clear fluids, 6 h for light meal, and 8 h for fatty meal, carbohydrate drink 300 ml or high energy semifluid solid drink 300 ml ingested 10 min subsequent to initiation of epidural analgesia with unspecified constituentsGastric US then performed in RLSR at 45 degrees before ingestion and at 5 and 30 min and 1, 1.5, and 2 h subsequent to ingestionGastric antral CSA decreased at 30 min and 1 and 1.5 h with carbohydrate drink compared with high energy semifluid solid drink in labourNo difference in gastric antral CSA at 2 h between carbohydrate drink and high energy semifluid solid drink in labourMiscellaneous drugsHoward et al., 197349Labour (25)Randomised controlled trialI.V.

CSA decreased at 30 min and 1 and 1.5 h with carbohydrate drink compared with high energy semifluid solid drink in labourNo difference in gastric antral CSA at 2 h between carbohydrate drink and high energy semifluid solid drink in labourMiscellaneous drugsHoward et al., 197349Labour (25)Randomised controlled trialI.V. oxytocin infusionI.M. meperidine if needed for analgesiaPlacebo (12)Metoclopramide (13)Nasogastric sampling and dye dilutionLiquidsFollowing a fast of at least 18 h, gastric contents aspirated before ingestion of water 750 ml containing phenol red 30 μg ml−1Nasogastric sampling then performed every 10 min for 2–3 hGastric half emptying time decreased in labour with metoclopramide (51 min and sd unspecified) compared with labour without metoclopramide (141 min and sd unspecified)No difference in gastric volume at 10 min between placebo and metoclopramideGastric volume at 20 min reduced in labour with metoclopramide (451 [150] ml) compared with labour without metoclopramide (613 [41] ml)Gastric volume at 30 min reduced in labour with metoclopramide (363 [119] ml) compared with labour without metoclopramide (567 [42] ml)Frame et al., 198450Labour (30)Randomised controlled trialEpidural with unspecified componentsPlacebo (15)Naloxone (15)Paracetamol absorptionDrug and liquidsFollowing a fast of at least 4 h, patients given i.m. meperidine 100 mg and then epidural analgesia with unspecified constituentsThey then received i.v.

67 [42] ml)Frame et al., 198450Labour (30)Randomised controlled trialEpidural with unspecified componentsPlacebo (15)Naloxone (15)Paracetamol absorptionDrug and liquidsFollowing a fast of at least 4 h, patients given i.m. meperidine 100 mg and then epidural analgesia with unspecified constituentsThey then received i.v. naloxone 1.2 mg or saline 3 ml followed by ingestion of paracetamol 1.5 g and water 100 mlBlood sampling then performed every 15 min for 1.5 hArea under plasma paracetamol curve at 30 min decreased in labour with naloxone (2.1 [0.5] μg ml−1 h−1) compared with labour without naloxone (1.5 [0.3] μg ml−1 h−1)No difference in area under plasma paracetamol curve at 1.5 h or peak plasma paracetamol concentration between naloxone and placeboPostpartum and nonpregnant after postpartumChanges over time in postpartumVial et al., 201759Labour (100)Postpartum (100)Prospective cohort studyPostpartum:<45 min following neonatal deliveryGastric USLiquidsFollowing an unspecified fast, patients given epidural levobupivacaine 0.125%, 10 ml with sufentanil 10 μg and subsequently received levobupivacaine 0.125% with sufentanil 0.5 μg ml−1 as a continuous infusion at 5 ml h−1 with patient-controlled epidural boluses of 5 mlGastric US performed in semirecumbent position at 45 degrees then performed immediately following epidural insertion and within 45 min following neonatal deliveryEmpty stomach if gastric antral CSA <381 mm230% of patients had clear fluids and none had solids following epidural insertionClear fluid ingestion in labour was not a risk factor for the presence of full stomach following neonatal delivery12.2% of patients with empty stomach at epidural insertion had full stomach subsequent to neonatal delivery and 24.4% of patients with full stomach at epidural insertion had empty stomach following neonatal deliveryGin et al., 199160Postpartum (22)Prospective cohort study1 day, 3 days, and 6 weeks following neonatal deliveryParacetamol absorptionDrug and liquidsFollowing an overnight fast, ingestion of paracetamol 1.5 g with water 100 mlBlood sampling then performed every 15–30 min for 2 hArea under plasma paracetamol curve at 1 h increased at 6 weeks compared with 1 day and 3 days postpartum (numbers unspecified)Area under plasma paracetamol curve at 2 h increased at 6 weeks (51.1 [10.4] μg ml−1 h−1) compared with 1 day (43.8 [5.8] μg ml−1 h−1) and 3 days postpartum (42.3 [5] μg ml−1 h−1)No difference in peak plasma paracetamol concentration between 1 day, 3 days, and 6

ed with 1 day and 3 days postpartum (numbers unspecified)Area under plasma paracetamol curve at 2 h increased at 6 weeks (51.1 [10.4] μg ml−1 h−1) compared with 1 day (43.8 [5.8] μg ml−1 h−1) and 3 days postpartum (42.3 [5] μg ml−1 h−1)No difference in peak plasma paracetamol concentration between 1 day, 3 days, and 6 weeks postpartumRegional anaesthesia or analgesia with no opioid vs opioid in postpartumKing et al., 200461Postpartum (40)Randomised controlled trialIntrathecal bupivacaine alone (20)Intrathecal bupivacaine and opioid (20)Paracetamol absorptionDrug and liquidsFollowing an overnight fast, spinal anaesthesia with intrathecal bupivacaine 0.5%, 2.75 ml with or without diamorphine 300 μg for Caesarean delivery30 min postoperatively, patients received paracetamol 1.5 g with water 100 mlBlood sampling then performed every 15–30 min for 2 hNo difference in area under plasma paracetamol curve at 2 h or peak plasma paracetamol concentration between intrathecal bupivacaine and opioid and intrathecal bupivacaine aloneTime to peak plasma paracetamol concentration increased with intrathecal bupivacaine and opioid (72.6 [41.9] min) compared with intrathecal bupivacaine alone (41.8 [20.8] min)Geddes et al.

l curve at 2 h or peak plasma paracetamol concentration between intrathecal bupivacaine and opioid and intrathecal bupivacaine aloneTime to peak plasma paracetamol concentration increased with intrathecal bupivacaine and opioid (72.6 [41.9] min) compared with intrathecal bupivacaine alone (41.8 [20.8] min)Geddes et al. 199162Postpartum (30)Randomised controlled trialEpidural bupivacaine alone (15)Epidural bupivacaine and opioid (15)Paracetamol absorptionDrug and liquidsFollowing an unspecified fast, ingestion of ranitidine 150 mgEpidural anaesthesia with bupivacaine 0.5% for Caesarean deliverySubsequent to Caesarean delivery, patients received epidural bupivacaine 0.25%, 8 ml with or without fentanyl 100 μg and ingested paracetamol 1.5 g with water 50 mlBlood sampling then performed every 15 min for 1.5 hArea under plasma paracetamol curve at 45 min decreased with epidural bupivacaine and opioid (2.5 [3.9] mg ml−1 h−1) compared with epidural bupivacaine alone (7.5 [3.2] mg ml−1 h−1)No difference in area under plasma paracetamol curve at 1.5 h or peak plasma paracetamol concentration between epidural bupivacaine and opioid and epidural bupivacaine alonePostpartum vs other groupsWald et al., 198263Pregnant (T3) (15)Postpartum (15)Prospective cohort studyPostpartum:4–6 weeks following neonatal deliveryBreath hydrogen analysisDrug and liquidsFollowing an overnight fast, ingestion of lactulose 11.5 g with water 100 mlBreath sampling then performed every 10 minOCTT increased in T3 (131 [54] min) compared with postpartum (93 [27] min)Lawson et al., 198572Pregnant (T1–3) (42)Postpartum (17)Prospective cohort studyPregnant:T1(8)T2 (12)T3 (22)Postpartum:4–8 weeks following neonatal deliveryBreath hydrogen analysisDrug and liquidsFollowing an overnight fast, ingestion of lactulose 10 g with water 100 mlBreath sampling then performed every 15 min for 4 hOCTT increased in T2 (125 [48] min) and T3 (137 [58] min) compared with postpartum (75 [33] min)O'Sullivan et al., 198773Pregnant (T3) (18)Postpartum (15)Nonpregnant (13)Cross-sectional studyPostpartum:<60 min following neonatal deliveryNo opioid in labour (10)Opioid in labour (5)Epigastric impedanceLiquidsFollowing a fast of at least 4 h, ingestion of water or diluted orange concentrate 500 mlElectrical impedance then measured through electrodes on the epigastriumGastric half emptying time increased in postpartum (13.0 [7.4] min) compared with T3 (7.2 [2.5] min) and nonpregnant (8.3 [3.2] min)Gastric half emptying time increased in postpa

at least 4 h, ingestion of water or diluted orange concentrate 500 mlElectrical impedance then measured through electrodes on the epigastriumGastric half emptying time increased in postpartum (13.0 [7.4] min) compared with T3 (7.2 [2.5] min) and nonpregnant (8.3 [3.2] min)Gastric half emptying time increased in postpa rtum following opioid in labour (18.2 [8.9] min) compared with postpartum without opioid in labour (10.3 [4.4] min)Sandhar et al., 199265Pregnant (T3) (10)Postpartum (20)Prospective cohort studyPostpartum:2–3 days (10)6 weeks (10)Epigastric impedanceDrug and liquidsFollowing a 4-h fast and ranitidine 150 mg, ingestion of water 400 mlElectrical impedance then measured through electrodes on the epigastriumNo difference in gastric half emptying time between T3 and postpartumWhitehead et al., 199321Pregnant (T1–3) (64)Postpartum (55)Nonpregnant (32)Prospective cohort studyPregnant:T1 (18)T2 (10)T3 (36)Postpartum:2 h–5 days following neonatal deliveryIn those 2 h postpartum (17), 4 had i.m.

ugh electrodes on the epigastriumNo difference in gastric half emptying time between T3 and postpartumWhitehead et al., 199321Pregnant (T1–3) (64)Postpartum (55)Nonpregnant (32)Prospective cohort studyPregnant:T1 (18)T2 (10)T3 (36)Postpartum:2 h–5 days following neonatal deliveryIn those 2 h postpartum (17), 4 had i.m. meperidine and 8 received epidural analgesiaParacetamol absorptionDrug and liquidsFollowing a fast of least 4 h, ingestion of paracetamol 1.5 g with water 50 mlBlood sampling then performed every 10–30 min for 2 hArea under plasma paracetamol concentration curve decreased in postpartum at 2 h (3.8 [4.1] mg L−1 h−1) compared with nonpregnant (13.5 [5.8] mg L−1 h−1)Peak plasma paracetamol concentration reduced in postpartum at 2 h (12.5 [5.1] mg L−1) compared with nonpregnant (20.8 [14] mg L−1)Time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration increased in postpartum at 2 h (120 [22.5] min) compared with nonpregnant (40 [27.5] min)No difference in area under plasma paracetamol curve at 120 min, peak plasma paracetamol concentration and time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration between postpartum at 1–5 days and nonpregnantNimmo et al., 197535Labour (46)Postpartum (10)Cross-sectional studyLabour:No opioid (12)Opioid (34)Postpartum:2–5 days following neonatal deliveryParacetamol absorptionDrug and liquidsFollowing a fast of at least 4 h and a variable period following opioid, ingestion of paracetamol 1.5 g with water 200 mlBlood sampling then performed every 15 min for 1.5 h and subsequently every 1–2 h up to 8 hNo difference in peak plasma paracetamol concentration between no opioid in labour and postpartumMiller et al., 198666Postpartum (12)Nonpregnant (14)Prospective cohort studyPostpartum:36–110 h following neonatal deliveryParacetamol absorptionDrug and liquidsFollowing a fast of at least 4 h, ingestion of paracetamol 1.5 g with unspecified amount of waterBlood sampling then performed every 15–30 min for 2 hArea under plasma paracetamol curve decreased in postpartum compared with nonpregnant (numbers unspecified)Peak plasma paracetamol concentration decreased in postpartum (18.7 [8.1] μg ml−1) compared with nonpregnant (24.6 [10.4] μg ml−1)Lam et al., 199367Postpartum (100)Nonpregnant (50)Randomised controlled trialPostpartum:<5 days following neonatal deliveryFasted (50)Nonfasted (50)Nasogastric samplingLiquidsPostpartum patients having tubal ligation and nonpregnant patients scheduled for laparoscopic surgeryFollowing an overnight fast, ingestion of water 150

l., 199367Postpartum (100)Nonpregnant (50)Randomised controlled trialPostpartum:<5 days following neonatal deliveryFasted (50)Nonfasted (50)Nasogastric samplingLiquidsPostpartum patients having tubal ligation and nonpregnant patients scheduled for laparoscopic surgeryFollowing an overnight fast, ingestion of water 150 ml in half the postpartum patientsStandardised general anaestheticNasogastric sampling then performedNo difference in gastric volume between fasted postpartum, nonfasted postpartum, and nonpregnantJayaram et al., 199768Postpartum (48)Nonpregnant (45)Cross-sectional studyPostpartum:<1 day postpartum following neonatal deliveryGastric USSolidsFirst study:Postpartum patients having tubal ligation and nonpregnant patients scheduled for gynaecological surgeryFollowing a fast of at least 6 h, gastric US then performed in erect position before induction of anaesthesiaSecond study:Postpartum patients having recently delivered and nonpregnant patients not scheduled for surgeryFollowing an unspecified fast, ingestion of a standard meal (carbohydrate 115–120 g, fat 25–30 g, and protein 15–20 g)Gastric US then performed in semirecumbent position at 0 and 4 hFirst study:Solid food detected in stomach of 39.3% of postpartum patients compared with no solid food present in stomach in nonpregnant at 6 hSecond study:Solid food detected in stomach of 95% of postpartum patients compared with solid food present in stomach of 19% of nonpregnant patients at 4 hScrutton et al., 199769Postpartum (6)Nonpregnant (10)Prospective cohort studyPostpartum:18–24 h following neonatal deliveryGastric US and scintigraphyDrug, liquids and solidsFollowing an overnight fast, ingestion of carbohydrate 200 ml labelled with 15 Mbq 99Tcm Dowex resin and water 200 mlGastric US of then performed in supine position every 15–30 min for 2 h and scintigraphy imaging every 1–30 min for 2 hNo difference in rate of gastric emptying between postpartum and nonpregnantNonpregnant after postpartum vs other groupsStanley et al., 199530Pregnant (T1–3) (29)Nonpregnant after postpartum (10)Prospective cohort studyPregnant:T1 (10)T2 (9)T3 (10)Nonpregnant after postpartum:8 weeks following neonatal delivery (10)Paracetamol absorptionLiquids and solidsFollowing an 8-h fast, ingestion of a standard meal (carbohydrate 59 g, fat 21.2 g, and protein 17.9 g) with water 200 ml and paracetamol 1.5 g with water 50 mlBlood sampling then performed every 20 min for 2.7 hNo difference in peak plasma paracetamol concentration or time to

10)Paracetamol absorptionLiquids and solidsFollowing an 8-h fast, ingestion of a standard meal (carbohydrate 59 g, fat 21.2 g, and protein 17.9 g) with water 200 ml and paracetamol 1.5 g with water 50 mlBlood sampling then performed every 20 min for 2.7 hNo difference in peak plasma paracetamol concentration or time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration between T1, T2, T3, and nonpregnant after postpartumSzilagyi et al., 199628Pregnant (T2–3) (30)Nonpregnant after postpartum (27)Nonpregnant (17)Prospective cohort studyPregnant:Unspecified mix of T2–3Nonpregnant after postpartum:3–14 months following neonatal deliveryBreath hydrogen analysisDrug and liquidsFollowing an overnight fast, ingestion of lactulose 10 g with water 100 mlBreath sampling then performed every 10 min for 3 hOCTT increased in pregnant (99.2 [7.8] min) and nonpregnant after postpartum (68.5 [6.4] min) compared with nonpregnant (63.5 [8.7] min)Chiloiro et al., 200132Pregnant (T1 and 3) (22)Nonpregnant after postpartum (11)Prospective cohort studyPregnant:T1 (11)T3(11)Nonpregnant after postpartum:4–6 months following neonatal deliveryBreath hydrogen analysis and gastric USDrug and liquidsFollowing an overnight fast, ingestion of lactulose 18 g with water 180 mlBreath sampling then performed every 10 min for 4–6 h and gastric US in erect position every 10 min until stomach emptyOCTT increased in T3 (100 [95% IQR 50.5–240] min) compared with nonpregnant after postpartum (70 [95% IQR 40.5–240] min)No difference in gastric emptying between T1, T3 and nonpregnant after postpartum

Breath sampling then performed every 10 min for 4–6 h and gastric US in erect position every 10 min until stomach emptyOCTT increased in T3 (100 [95% IQR 50.5–240] min) compared with nonpregnant after postpartum (70 [95% IQR 40.5–240] min)No difference in gastric emptying between T1, T3 and nonpregnant after postpartum Characteristics of the included trials. All Caesarean deliveries were elective unless otherwise stated. Differences only reported as significant if P<0.05. CSA, cross-sectional area; OCTT, orocaecal transit time; RLSR, right lateral semirecumbent; T1, first trimester; T2, second trimester; T3, third trimester; US, ultrasound.

eristics of the included trials. All Caesarean deliveries were elective unless otherwise stated. Differences only reported as significant if P<0.05. CSA, cross-sectional area; OCTT, orocaecal transit time; RLSR, right lateral semirecumbent; T1, first trimester; T2, second trimester; T3, third trimester; US, ultrasound. These different methods of examining gastric emptying are now summarised in brief. Gastric ultrasound involves the repeated acquisition of sonographic images to visualise the gastric antrum, the more dependent area of the stomach, and leads to qualitative and quantitative assessment.15,16 Qualitative evaluation uses the Perlas grading scale. For patients who are nonpregnant, in T1, or postpartum, gastric ultrasound is carried out in the supine and right lateral position and for who those in T2 and T3, it is conducted in the right lateral semirecumbent and semirecumbent position. Gastric contents shift under the influence of gravity, and ultrasound should be performed in precisely defined positions to allow reliable imaging and consistent measurement.74 The right lateral semirecumbent and semirecumbent position are preferred in pregnancy to avoid the effect of supine aortocaval compression75 and displace the gravid uterus away from the ultrasound path.70 In Grade 0 an empty gastric antrum is appreciated in the right lateral semirecumbent and semirecumbent position, in Grade 1 an empty gastric antrum is seen in the semirecumbent position although clear fluids are visible in the right lateral semirecumbent position, in Grade 2 clear fluids are viewed in both of these positions, and in Grade 3 thick fluids or solids are present in the stomach. Quantitative evaluation utilises the cross-sectional area of the gastric antrum to estimate the volume in the stomach.76 If administered orally, paracetamol is absorbed poorly in the stomach but well in the duodenum and proximal jejunum. Given that gastric emptying is hence the rate-limiting step in the delivery of the drug to its absorption site, the speed of paracetamol absorption into the blood indirectly reflects the rate of gastric emptying. The area under plasma paracetamol curve and peak plasma paracetamol concentration are proportional and the time to peak paracetamol concentration is inversely proportional to the rate of gastric emptying. Nasogastric sampling directly measures the volume of the stomach.

indirectly reflects the rate of gastric emptying. The area under plasma paracetamol curve and peak plasma paracetamol concentration are proportional and the time to peak paracetamol concentration is inversely proportional to the rate of gastric emptying. Nasogastric sampling directly measures the volume of the stomach. In the dye dilution method, dye is progressively added to the stomach and the volume is then calculated from the resulting change in its concentration.64 With breath hydrogen analysis, the oral administration of lactulose leads to its unmetabolised transit through the stomach and intestine, as no naturally occurring lactulose enzyme is present in these regions, and the subsequent metabolism of lactulose to hydrogen by bacteria in the caecum.77 The resulting increase in the expired hydrogen concentration is therefore related to the orocaecal transit time rather than only the rate of gastric emptying. In epigastric impedance, the change in resistance to an alternating current is measured over time.78 The use of barium X-ray enables the direct visualisation of barium as it empties from the stomach and transits through the gastrointestinal tract. In breath 13C-octanoic acid analysis, the medium-chain fatty acid once ingested is emptied from the stomach and absorbed in the proximal small intestine.16 It is then transported to the liver and metabolised to carbon dioxide. The carbon dioxide is labelled with 13C as a specific marker of octanoic acid oxidation and subsequently excreted from the lungs, where it is measured. With electrogastrography, the myoelectrical signals from the stomach are recorded from the skin surface and facilitate the monitoring of gastric activity and motility.78 The radiotelemetry pH pill signals its emptying from the stomach with the sudden change of pH from acidic in the gastric milieu to almost alkaline in the duodenum.16 Scintigraphy has been recognised as the gold standard to directly quantify gastric emptying and involves the utilisation of a gamma camera to identify the radiation emitted from the ingested standard meal.

m the stomach with the sudden change of pH from acidic in the gastric milieu to almost alkaline in the duodenum.16 Scintigraphy has been recognised as the gold standard to directly quantify gastric emptying and involves the utilisation of a gamma camera to identify the radiation emitted from the ingested standard meal. Compared with patients who were nonpregnant, women in T1 were demonstrated in four studies and two studies at moderate risk of bias to have either a decrease with water22,24,26,27 or no difference with water or solids21,29 in gastric emptying, respectively. One of these studies was a randomised controlled trial and found gastric emptying with water to reduce in patients in T1 relative to women who were nonpregnant.22 The method to investigate gastric emptying was paracetamol absorption with water21,22,24,26,27 and breath 13C-octanoic acid analysis with solids.29 One observational study, that was at moderate risk of bias, noted no difference in gastric emptying with water between T1, T2, and T326 and another observational study, which was at high risk of bias, revealed the orocaecal transit time with water to increase with the progression of pregnancy.72 Compared with patients who were nonpregnant, women in T2 were found by paracetamol absorption in two observational studies at moderate risk of bias to have no difference in gastric emptying with water or water and solids.21,26

Compared with patients who were nonpregnant, women in T1 were demonstrated in four studies and two studies at moderate risk of bias to have either a decrease with water22,24,26,27 or no difference with water or solids21,29 in gastric emptying, respectively. One of these studies was a randomised controlled trial and found gastric emptying with water to reduce in patients in T1 relative to women who were nonpregnant.22 The method to investigate gastric emptying was paracetamol absorption with water21,22,24,26,27 and breath 13C-octanoic acid analysis with solids.29 One observational study, that was at moderate risk of bias, noted no difference in gastric emptying with water between T1, T2, and T326 and another observational study, which was at high risk of bias, revealed the orocaecal transit time with water to increase with the progression of pregnancy.72 Compared with patients who were nonpregnant, women in T2 were found by paracetamol absorption in two observational studies at moderate risk of bias to have no difference in gastric emptying with water or water and solids.21,26 Compared with patients who were nonpregnant, women in T3 were demonstrated in seven studies, including one nonrandomised controlled trial23 and one at low risk of bias,71 to have no difference in gastric emptying with water, diluted orange concentrate, liquid formula, or solids.21,23,25,26,64,71,73 One observational study, however, found gastric emptying to decrease with water and solids in patients in T3 relative to women who were nonpregnant.5 The method to investigate gastric emptying was paracetamol absorption in two studies21,26 and varied in the remaining ones.5,23,25,64,71,73

or solids.21,23,25,26,64,71,73 One observational study, however, found gastric emptying to decrease with water and solids in patients in T3 relative to women who were nonpregnant.5 The method to investigate gastric emptying was paracetamol absorption in two studies21,26 and varied in the remaining ones.5,23,25,64,71,73 In women who were T3, the ingestion of liquid formula following a fast of 2 h for clear liquids and 6 h for solids led to all patients having a gastric volume of <80 ml on gastric ultrasound at 2 h.42 Further, carbohydrate drink51,52 and tea with milk53 resulted in no difference in gastric antral cross-sectional area at this same time point compared with baseline or water. Subsequent to the ingestion of solids, no food was present in the stomach at 4 h.70 In patients who were T1, glycopyrronium decreased the area under plasma paracetamol curve with water compared with no premedication and atropine.22 In women who were T3, no difference in gastric half emptying time with water was found between the antacids, magnesium trisilicate, and sodium citrate.23

In women who were T3, the ingestion of liquid formula following a fast of 2 h for clear liquids and 6 h for solids led to all patients having a gastric volume of <80 ml on gastric ultrasound at 2 h.42 Further, carbohydrate drink51,52 and tea with milk53 resulted in no difference in gastric antral cross-sectional area at this same time point compared with baseline or water. Subsequent to the ingestion of solids, no food was present in the stomach at 4 h.70 In patients who were T1, glycopyrronium decreased the area under plasma paracetamol curve with water compared with no premedication and atropine.22 In women who were T3, no difference in gastric half emptying time with water was found between the antacids, magnesium trisilicate, and sodium citrate.23 In patients who were fasted, granisetron decreased the gastric antral cross-sectional area at 1 h compared with baseline.55 Metoclopramide reduced the gastric antral cross-sectional area at 1 h relative to baseline56 and resulted in an increase in the plasma paracetamol concentration at this same time point.36 Following Caesarean delivery, two randomised controlled trials at moderate risk of bias investigated by paracetamol absorption the effect of the constituents of the neuraxial technique on gastric emptying with water in the immediate postpartum period.61,62 Compared with intrathecal bupivacaine alone, intrathecal diamorphine in addition to bupivacaine increased the time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration, although no difference was found in regard to the area under plasma paracetamol curve at 2 h and the peak plasma paracetamol concentration.61 Relative to epidural bupivacaine alone, epidural fentanyl with bupivacaine reduced the area under plasma paracetamol curve at 45 min, but no difference was shown with respect to the area under plasma paracetamol curve at 1.5 h and the peak plasma paracetamol concentration.62 Subsequent to Caesarean delivery, the ingestion of carbohydrate drink in a randomised controlled trial at moderate risk of bias increased the gastric antral cross-sectional area at 1 h although not 1.5 h relative to water.52

e area under plasma paracetamol curve at 1.5 h and the peak plasma paracetamol concentration.62 Subsequent to Caesarean delivery, the ingestion of carbohydrate drink in a randomised controlled trial at moderate risk of bias increased the gastric antral cross-sectional area at 1 h although not 1.5 h relative to water.52 Compared with patients who were T3 and nonpregnant, women in labour were demonstrated in two observational studies, one at low risk of bias and by gastric ultrasound71 and one at high risk of bias and by nasogastric sampling and dye dilution,64 to have increased gastric volume with water at 30 min64 and decreased gastric emptying fraction with solids at 1 h.71 Patients in labour were found by paracetamol absorption in one randomised controlled trial at moderate risk of bias to have a reduced plasma paracetamol concentration with water at 1 h relative to women who were having Caesarean delivery.36 In a randomised controlled trial at moderate risk of bias, gastric emptying was noted by gastric ultrasound to decrease with orange juice or coffee and milk compared with maltodextrin and no difference in gastric emptying was revealed between orange juice and coffee with milk.34 Intramuscular diamorphine and meperidine were shown by paracetamol absorption in one observational study at moderate risk of bias to reduce the peak plasma paracetamol concentration and increase the time to peak plasma paracetamol with water relative to no opioid in labour.35 These findings for intramuscular meperidine were supported by the results of a randomised controlled trial.36 The inhibitory effect of intramuscular diamorphine and meperidine on gastric emptying was not reversed by metoclopramide in one observational study.35 This effect with meperidine, however, was reversed in a larger randomised controlled trial.36

eperidine were supported by the results of a randomised controlled trial.36 The inhibitory effect of intramuscular diamorphine and meperidine on gastric emptying was not reversed by metoclopramide in one observational study.35 This effect with meperidine, however, was reversed in a larger randomised controlled trial.36 Compared with patients who were T3 and nonpregnant, epidural bupivacaine alone for women in labour was demonstrated by gastric ultrasound in one observational study at high risk of bias to increase the risk of solid food detection in the stomach, independent of the time from last oral intake, from 0% to 71.8% at 0–24 h.70 Relative to patients who were T3 or nonpregnant, epidural ropivacaine and opioid for women in labour was found by gastric ultrasound in one observational study at low risk of bias to lead to an increased gastric emptying time with solids.71 Importantly, in the same observational study, the gastric emptying fraction was increased in labour with epidural ropivacaine and opioid compared with without epidural. In two randomised controlled trials, one at low risk of bias39 and one at high risk of bias, the incidence of empty stomach did not differ by gastric ultrasound between fasted and apple juice in patients who had epidural ropivacaine and opioid,39 and no difference in gastric emptying was shown between water and water with protein drink in women who received epidural bupivacaine and opioid.37 In the presence of an epidural with unspecified constituents, the gastric antral cross-sectional area was decreased at 1.5 h but not 2 h following the ingestion of a carbohydrate drink relative to a high-energy semifluid solid drink in a randomised controlled trial at moderate risk of bias.48

bupivacaine and opioid.37 In the presence of an epidural with unspecified constituents, the gastric antral cross-sectional area was decreased at 1.5 h but not 2 h following the ingestion of a carbohydrate drink relative to a high-energy semifluid solid drink in a randomised controlled trial at moderate risk of bias.48 The constituents of the epidural solution may have an effect on gastric emptying.

bupivacaine and opioid.37 In the presence of an epidural with unspecified constituents, the gastric antral cross-sectional area was decreased at 1.5 h but not 2 h following the ingestion of a carbohydrate drink relative to a high-energy semifluid solid drink in a randomised controlled trial at moderate risk of bias.48 The constituents of the epidural solution may have an effect on gastric emptying. In regard to the concentration and volume of local anaesthetic, two randomised controlled trials at moderate risk of bias used the method of paracetamol absorption with water to investigate this.43,46 No difference was demonstrated between epidural lower concentration bupivacaine and epidural higher concentration bupivacaine alone of same volume in the area under plasma paracetamol concentration and the time to peak plasma concentration.43 Moreover, no difference was shown between epidural higher concentration and lower volume bupivacaine and epidural higher concentration and volume bupivacaine alone in the area under plasma paracetamol concentration, peak plasma paracetamol concentration, and the time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration.46 In relation to the presence of opioid, three randomised controlled trials at moderate risk of bias used the technique of paracetamol absorption with water to investigate this.41,43,44 On the one hand, in one randomised controlled trial, the administration of an epidural bolus dose of fentanyl 100 μg in addition to bupivacaine decreased the peak plasma paracetamol concentration and increased the time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration compared with bupivacaine alone.41 In another randomised controlled trial, the use of an epidural bolus dose of fentanyl 50 μg or 100 μg with bupivacaine increased the time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration and diamorphine 5 mg with bupivacaine reduced the peak plasma paracetamol concentration and increased the time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration.43 On the other hand, in one randomised controlled trial, the administration of an epidural bolus dose of fentanyl 50 μg followed by a continuous infusion with fentanyl 2 μg ml−1 in addition to bupivacaine did not affect the area under plasma paracetamol curve at 45 min or 1.5 h, peak plasma paracetamol concentration, and the time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration relative to bupivacaine alone.44 In the previously mentioned randomised controlled trial, the use of an epidural bolus dose of diamorphine 2.5 mg with bupivacaine did not influence the peak plasma paracetamol concentration and the time to peak plasma paracetam

tion, and the time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration relative to bupivacaine alone.44 In the previously mentioned randomised controlled trial, the use of an epidural bolus dose of diamorphine 2.5 mg with bupivacaine did not influence the peak plasma paracetamol concentration and the time to peak plasma paracetam ol concentration.43 With respect to the dose of opioid, two randomised controlled trials at moderate risk of bias investigated this.43,47 In one randomised controlled trial, epidural fentanyl at a bolus dose of 25 μg followed by a continuous infusion of 1 μg ml−1 was compared with a bolus dose of 50 μg and a subsequent continuous infusion of 2 μg ml−1.47 Indices of gastric emptying with unrestricted liquids and solids did not vary using the method of gastric ultrasound. In another randomised controlled trial, epidural diamorphine at a bolus dose of 2.5 mg did not affect the peak plasma paracetamol concentration and the time to peak plasma concentration, but a bolus dose of 5 mg did reduce the peak plasma paracetamol concentration and increase the time to peak paracetamol concentration.43 The use of intrathecal bupivacaine and fentanyl in labour in a randomised controlled trial at moderate risk of bias slowed gastric emptying with water relative to epidural bupivacaine alone and epidural bupivacaine with opioid using the technique of paracetamol absorption.45

he time to peak paracetamol concentration.43 The use of intrathecal bupivacaine and fentanyl in labour in a randomised controlled trial at moderate risk of bias slowed gastric emptying with water relative to epidural bupivacaine alone and epidural bupivacaine with opioid using the technique of paracetamol absorption.45 In the absence or presence of intramuscular meperidine, metoclopramide decreased the gastric half emptying time and reduced the gastric volume with water at 30 min49 and increased the plasma paracetamol concentration at 1 h.36 In the presence of an epidural with unspecified constituents, naloxone decreased the area under plasma paracetamol curve with water at 30 min but did not result in any difference in the peak plasma paracetamol concentration.50

ic volume with water at 30 min49 and increased the plasma paracetamol concentration at 1 h.36 In the presence of an epidural with unspecified constituents, naloxone decreased the area under plasma paracetamol curve with water at 30 min but did not result in any difference in the peak plasma paracetamol concentration.50 Indices related to gastric emptying changed over time in the postpartum period. In one observational study at moderate risk of bias, the area under plasma paracetamol curve increased with water at 2 h at 6 weeks compared with 1 and 3 days postpartum, although no difference was demonstrated between these three time points in regard to the peak plasma paracetamol concentration.60 Compared with patients who were T2, women were found by breath hydrogen analysis in one observational study at high risk of bias to have a decreased orocaecal transit time with water at 4–8 weeks postpartum.72 Relative to patients who were T3, women were noted by breath hydrogen analysis in two observational studies, one at moderate risk of bias72 and one at high risk of bias,63 to have a reduced orocaecal transit time with water at 4–8 weeks postpartum.63,72 In another observational study at moderate risk of bias, however, no difference in epigastric impedance with water was revealed between patients who were T3 and women 2 days to 6 weeks postpartum.65 No difference was shown in one observational study at moderate risk of bias between patients in labour without opioid and women who were 2–5 days postpartum with respect to the peak plasma paracetamol concentration with water.35 On the one hand, compared with patients who were nonpregnant, women were found by paracetamol absorption in one observational study at moderate risk of bias to have a decreased area under plasma paracetamol curve and peak plasma paracetamol concentration with water at 36–110 h postpartum.66 In an observational study at high risk of bias, subsequent to the ingestion of solids, patients who were nonpregnant did not have solids present in the stomach relative to 39.3% of women at <1 day postpartum who did at 6 h.68 On the other hand, compared with patients who were nonpregnant, women were shown by two observational studies, one at moderate risk of bias and by nasogastric sampling with or without water67 and one at moderate risk of bias and by gastric ultrasound and scintigraphy with carbohydrate drink,69 to have no difference in the gastric volume or the rate of gastric emptying at <5 days postpartum.67,69

wn by two observational studies, one at moderate risk of bias and by nasogastric sampling with or without water67 and one at moderate risk of bias and by gastric ultrasound and scintigraphy with carbohydrate drink,69 to have no difference in the gastric volume or the rate of gastric emptying at <5 days postpartum.67,69 Compared with patients in T1, T2, and T3, women were found by paracetamol absorption in one observational study at moderate risk of bias to have no difference in the peak plasma paracetamol concentration or the time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration with water and solids at 8 weeks postpartum.30 Relative to patients in T1 and T3, women were shown by gastric ultrasound in one observational study at moderate risk of bias to have no difference in gastric emptying with water at 4–6 months postpartum.32 The orocaecal transit time with water, however, was increased in patients who were T3 compared with women at 4–6 months postpartum32 and in patients who were 3–14 months postpartum relative to nonpregnant women.28

Compared with patients who were nonpregnant, women in T1 were demonstrated in four studies and two studies at moderate risk of bias to have either a decrease with water22,24,26,27 or no difference with water or solids21,29 in gastric emptying, respectively. One of these studies was a randomised controlled trial and found gastric emptying with water to reduce in patients in T1 relative to women who were nonpregnant.22 The method to investigate gastric emptying was paracetamol absorption with water21,22,24,26,27 and breath 13C-octanoic acid analysis with solids.29 One observational study, that was at moderate risk of bias, noted no difference in gastric emptying with water between T1, T2, and T326 and another observational study, which was at high risk of bias, revealed the orocaecal transit time with water to increase with the progression of pregnancy.72 Compared with patients who were nonpregnant, women in T2 were found by paracetamol absorption in two observational studies at moderate risk of bias to have no difference in gastric emptying with water or water and solids.21,26

Compared with patients who were nonpregnant, women in T1 were demonstrated in four studies and two studies at moderate risk of bias to have either a decrease with water22,24,26,27 or no difference with water or solids21,29 in gastric emptying, respectively. One of these studies was a randomised controlled trial and found gastric emptying with water to reduce in patients in T1 relative to women who were nonpregnant.22 The method to investigate gastric emptying was paracetamol absorption with water21,22,24,26,27 and breath 13C-octanoic acid analysis with solids.29 One observational study, that was at moderate risk of bias, noted no difference in gastric emptying with water between T1, T2, and T326 and another observational study, which was at high risk of bias, revealed the orocaecal transit time with water to increase with the progression of pregnancy.72

Compared with patients who were nonpregnant, women in T2 were found by paracetamol absorption in two observational studies at moderate risk of bias to have no difference in gastric emptying with water or water and solids.21,26

Compared with patients who were nonpregnant, women in T3 were demonstrated in seven studies, including one nonrandomised controlled trial23 and one at low risk of bias,71 to have no difference in gastric emptying with water, diluted orange concentrate, liquid formula, or solids.21,23,25,26,64,71,73 One observational study, however, found gastric emptying to decrease with water and solids in patients in T3 relative to women who were nonpregnant.5 The method to investigate gastric emptying was paracetamol absorption in two studies21,26 and varied in the remaining ones.5,23,25,64,71,73 In women who were T3, the ingestion of liquid formula following a fast of 2 h for clear liquids and 6 h for solids led to all patients having a gastric volume of <80 ml on gastric ultrasound at 2 h.42 Further, carbohydrate drink51,52 and tea with milk53 resulted in no difference in gastric antral cross-sectional area at this same time point compared with baseline or water. Subsequent to the ingestion of solids, no food was present in the stomach at 4 h.70

In patients who were T1, glycopyrronium decreased the area under plasma paracetamol curve with water compared with no premedication and atropine.22 In women who were T3, no difference in gastric half emptying time with water was found between the antacids, magnesium trisilicate, and sodium citrate.23

In patients who were fasted, granisetron decreased the gastric antral cross-sectional area at 1 h compared with baseline.55 Metoclopramide reduced the gastric antral cross-sectional area at 1 h relative to baseline56 and resulted in an increase in the plasma paracetamol concentration at this same time point.36 Following Caesarean delivery, two randomised controlled trials at moderate risk of bias investigated by paracetamol absorption the effect of the constituents of the neuraxial technique on gastric emptying with water in the immediate postpartum period.61,62 Compared with intrathecal bupivacaine alone, intrathecal diamorphine in addition to bupivacaine increased the time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration, although no difference was found in regard to the area under plasma paracetamol curve at 2 h and the peak plasma paracetamol concentration.61 Relative to epidural bupivacaine alone, epidural fentanyl with bupivacaine reduced the area under plasma paracetamol curve at 45 min, but no difference was shown with respect to the area under plasma paracetamol curve at 1.5 h and the peak plasma paracetamol concentration.62 Subsequent to Caesarean delivery, the ingestion of carbohydrate drink in a randomised controlled trial at moderate risk of bias increased the gastric antral cross-sectional area at 1 h although not 1.5 h relative to water.52

Compared with patients who were T3 and nonpregnant, women in labour were demonstrated in two observational studies, one at low risk of bias and by gastric ultrasound71 and one at high risk of bias and by nasogastric sampling and dye dilution,64 to have increased gastric volume with water at 30 min64 and decreased gastric emptying fraction with solids at 1 h.71 Patients in labour were found by paracetamol absorption in one randomised controlled trial at moderate risk of bias to have a reduced plasma paracetamol concentration with water at 1 h relative to women who were having Caesarean delivery.36 In a randomised controlled trial at moderate risk of bias, gastric emptying was noted by gastric ultrasound to decrease with orange juice or coffee and milk compared with maltodextrin and no difference in gastric emptying was revealed between orange juice and coffee with milk.34 Intramuscular diamorphine and meperidine were shown by paracetamol absorption in one observational study at moderate risk of bias to reduce the peak plasma paracetamol concentration and increase the time to peak plasma paracetamol with water relative to no opioid in labour.35 These findings for intramuscular meperidine were supported by the results of a randomised controlled trial.36 The inhibitory effect of intramuscular diamorphine and meperidine on gastric emptying was not reversed by metoclopramide in one observational study.35 This effect with meperidine, however, was reversed in a larger randomised controlled trial.36

Compared with patients who were T3 and nonpregnant, epidural bupivacaine alone for women in labour was demonstrated by gastric ultrasound in one observational study at high risk of bias to increase the risk of solid food detection in the stomach, independent of the time from last oral intake, from 0% to 71.8% at 0–24 h.70 Relative to patients who were T3 or nonpregnant, epidural ropivacaine and opioid for women in labour was found by gastric ultrasound in one observational study at low risk of bias to lead to an increased gastric emptying time with solids.71 Importantly, in the same observational study, the gastric emptying fraction was increased in labour with epidural ropivacaine and opioid compared with without epidural. In two randomised controlled trials, one at low risk of bias39 and one at high risk of bias, the incidence of empty stomach did not differ by gastric ultrasound between fasted and apple juice in patients who had epidural ropivacaine and opioid,39 and no difference in gastric emptying was shown between water and water with protein drink in women who received epidural bupivacaine and opioid.37 In the presence of an epidural with unspecified constituents, the gastric antral cross-sectional area was decreased at 1.5 h but not 2 h following the ingestion of a carbohydrate drink relative to a high-energy semifluid solid drink in a randomised controlled trial at moderate risk of bias.48 The constituents of the epidural solution may have an effect on gastric emptying.

Compared with patients who were T3 and nonpregnant, epidural bupivacaine alone for women in labour was demonstrated by gastric ultrasound in one observational study at high risk of bias to increase the risk of solid food detection in the stomach, independent of the time from last oral intake, from 0% to 71.8% at 0–24 h.70 Relative to patients who were T3 or nonpregnant, epidural ropivacaine and opioid for women in labour was found by gastric ultrasound in one observational study at low risk of bias to lead to an increased gastric emptying time with solids.71 Importantly, in the same observational study, the gastric emptying fraction was increased in labour with epidural ropivacaine and opioid compared with without epidural. In two randomised controlled trials, one at low risk of bias39 and one at high risk of bias, the incidence of empty stomach did not differ by gastric ultrasound between fasted and apple juice in patients who had epidural ropivacaine and opioid,39 and no difference in gastric emptying was shown between water and water with protein drink in women who received epidural bupivacaine and opioid.37 In the presence of an epidural with unspecified constituents, the gastric antral cross-sectional area was decreased at 1.5 h but not 2 h following the ingestion of a carbohydrate drink relative to a high-energy semifluid solid drink in a randomised controlled trial at moderate risk of bias.48 The constituents of the epidural solution may have an effect on gastric emptying. In regard to the concentration and volume of local anaesthetic, two randomised controlled trials at moderate risk of bias used the method of paracetamol absorption with water to investigate this.43,46 No difference was demonstrated between epidural lower concentration bupivacaine and epidural higher concentration bupivacaine alone of same volume in the area under plasma paracetamol concentration and the time to peak plasma concentration.43 Moreover, no difference was shown between epidural higher concentration and lower volume bupivacaine and epidural higher concentration and volume bupivacaine alone in the area under plasma paracetamol concentration, peak plasma paracetamol concentration, and the time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration.46 In relation to the presence of opioid, three randomised controlled trials at moderate risk of bias used the technique of paracetamol absorption with water to investigate this.41,43,44 On the one hand, in one randomised controlled trial, the administration of an epidural bolus dose of fentanyl 100 μg in addition to bupivacaine decreased the peak plasma paracetamol concentration and increased the time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration compared with bupivacaine alone.41 In another randomised controlled trial, the use of an epidural bolus dose of fentanyl 50 μg or 100 μg with bupivacaine increased the time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration and diamorphine 5 mg with bupivacaine reduced the peak plasma paracetamol concentration and increased the time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration.43 On the other hand, in one randomised controlled trial, the administration of an epidural bolus dose of fentanyl 50 μg followed by a continuous infusion with fentanyl 2 μg ml−1 in addition to bupivacaine did not affect the area under plasma paracetamol curve at 45 min or 1.5 h, peak plasma paracetamol concentration, and the time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration relative to bupivacaine alone.44 In the previously mentioned randomised controlled trial, the use of an epidural bolus dose of diamorphine 2.5 mg with bupivacaine did not influence the peak plasma paracetamol concentration and the time to peak plasma paracetam

In the absence or presence of intramuscular meperidine, metoclopramide decreased the gastric half emptying time and reduced the gastric volume with water at 30 min49 and increased the plasma paracetamol concentration at 1 h.36 In the presence of an epidural with unspecified constituents, naloxone decreased the area under plasma paracetamol curve with water at 30 min but did not result in any difference in the peak plasma paracetamol concentration.50

Indices related to gastric emptying changed over time in the postpartum period. In one observational study at moderate risk of bias, the area under plasma paracetamol curve increased with water at 2 h at 6 weeks compared with 1 and 3 days postpartum, although no difference was demonstrated between these three time points in regard to the peak plasma paracetamol concentration.60 Compared with patients who were T2, women were found by breath hydrogen analysis in one observational study at high risk of bias to have a decreased orocaecal transit time with water at 4–8 weeks postpartum.72 Relative to patients who were T3, women were noted by breath hydrogen analysis in two observational studies, one at moderate risk of bias72 and one at high risk of bias,63 to have a reduced orocaecal transit time with water at 4–8 weeks postpartum.63,72 In another observational study at moderate risk of bias, however, no difference in epigastric impedance with water was revealed between patients who were T3 and women 2 days to 6 weeks postpartum.65 No difference was shown in one observational study at moderate risk of bias between patients in labour without opioid and women who were 2–5 days postpartum with respect to the peak plasma paracetamol concentration with water.35 On the one hand, compared with patients who were nonpregnant, women were found by paracetamol absorption in one observational study at moderate risk of bias to have a decreased area under plasma paracetamol curve and peak plasma paracetamol concentration with water at 36–110 h postpartum.66 In an observational study at high risk of bias, subsequent to the ingestion of solids, patients who were nonpregnant did not have solids present in the stomach relative to 39.3% of women at <1 day postpartum who did at 6 h.68 On the other hand, compared with patients who were nonpregnant, women were shown by two observational studies, one at moderate risk of bias and by nasogastric sampling with or without water67 and one at moderate risk of bias and by gastric ultrasound and scintigraphy with carbohydrate drink,69 to have no difference in the gastric volume or the rate of gastric emptying at <5 days postpartum.67,69

Compared with patients in T1, T2, and T3, women were found by paracetamol absorption in one observational study at moderate risk of bias to have no difference in the peak plasma paracetamol concentration or the time to peak plasma paracetamol concentration with water and solids at 8 weeks postpartum.30 Relative to patients in T1 and T3, women were shown by gastric ultrasound in one observational study at moderate risk of bias to have no difference in gastric emptying with water at 4–6 months postpartum.32 The orocaecal transit time with water, however, was increased in patients who were T3 compared with women at 4–6 months postpartum32 and in patients who were 3–14 months postpartum relative to nonpregnant women.28

In this narrative review, compared with patients who were not pregnant, gastric emptying in T1 was decreased with water in the majority of studies and not different with solids in one study. Gastric emptying in T2 and T3, relative to the nonpregnant phase, was not demonstrated to be different with water or solids in two studies and most studies, respectively. In the context of T3 and Caesarean delivery, the ingestion of carbohydrate drink or tea with milk vs continued fasting or water led to no difference in the gastric cross-sectional area at 2 h and, following the ingestion of solids, no food was present in the stomach at 4 h. Gastric emptying was delayed with neuraxial local anaesthetic and opioid compared with local anaesthetic alone. In the setting of labour without an epidural, gastric emptying was reduced with water or solids compared with women who were not pregnant or T3 and was slowed with orange juice or coffee and milk relative to carbohydrate drink. The administration of intramuscular diamorphine or meperidine further decreased gastric emptying. In labour with an epidural using local anaesthetic and opioid, gastric emptying was not different with water vs water with protein drink and was reduced with solids compared with the nonpregnant phase or T3, although it was increased with solids relative to labour without an epidural. Gastric emptying was not affected by the concentration of local anaesthetic in the epidural solution. The evidence in regard to the influence of opioid in the epidural solution on gastric emptying was conflicting, either decreasing it or making no difference. In labour, intrathecal local anaesthetic and opioid delayed gastric emptying with water compared with epidural local anaesthetic and opioid. The evidence with respect to the postpartum period was inconsistent. Relative to patients who were not pregnant, one study indicated that gastric emptying was still reduced with water and two studies suggested that it was not different in the first 5 days postpartum.

compared with epidural local anaesthetic and opioid. The evidence with respect to the postpartum period was inconsistent. Relative to patients who were not pregnant, one study indicated that gastric emptying was still reduced with water and two studies suggested that it was not different in the first 5 days postpartum. In what follows, we will draw upon the findings of important and landmark studies in gastric ultrasound and interpret the evidence on gastric emptying to inform clinical practice (Table 2).Table 2Summary of main findings. Inconsistencies in evidence may reflect the unpredictability of gastric emptying in pregnancy.

compared with epidural local anaesthetic and opioid. The evidence with respect to the postpartum period was inconsistent. Relative to patients who were not pregnant, one study indicated that gastric emptying was still reduced with water and two studies suggested that it was not different in the first 5 days postpartum. In what follows, we will draw upon the findings of important and landmark studies in gastric ultrasound and interpret the evidence on gastric emptying to inform clinical practice (Table 2).Table 2Summary of main findings. Inconsistencies in evidence may reflect the unpredictability of gastric emptying in pregnancy. CSA, cross sectional area; T1, first trimester; T2, second trimester; T3, third trimester.Table 2Phase of pregnancyMethod of determinationPrincipal findingsT1Gastric emptyingDelay in gastric emptying with water in majority of studies compared with patients who were not pregnantNo difference in gastric emptying with solids in one study relative to women who were not pregnantT2Gastric emptyingNo difference in gastric emptying with water or solids in two studies compared with patients who were not pregnantT3Gastric emptyingNo difference in gastric emptying with water or solids in most studies compared with patients who were not pregnantFollowing the ingestion of food, no solids present in stomach at 4 hT1–3Gastric ultrasound but no measurement of gastric emptyingHigher gestational age increased likelihood of high-risk gastric contents on ultrasoundCaesarean deliveryGastric emptyingPreoperative ingestion of carbohydrate drink or tea with milk led to no difference in gastric CSA at 2 h compared with continued fasting or ingestion of waterFollowing the preoperative ingestion of food, no solids present in stomach at 4 hDelay in gastric emptying with intraoperative neuraxial opioid and local anaesthetic relative to local anaesthetic aloneGastric ultrasound without measurement of gastric emptyingStudies indicated, in the opinion of the authors, that patients who have followed standard fasting guidelines for elective Caesarean delivery may still have high-risk contents present in stomachLabour in generalGastric ultrasound but no measurement of gastric emptyingIn the first hour following admission to maternity unit in spontaneous labour or for induction of labour, >66% of patients had high-risk gastric contentsDuration of fasting for solids and maximum pain score in last hour of labour associated with presence of high-risk gastric contentsDuration of fasting for clear fluids not related to presence of high-risk gastric contentsUnrestricted oral intake resulted in 80% of women having high-risk gastric contentsStudies suggested, in the opinion of the authors, that women in labour who have eaten solids in the last 8 h still have high-risk contents present in the stomach, and

for clear fluids not related to presence of high-risk gastric contentsUnrestricted oral intake resulted in 80% of women having high-risk gastric contentsStudies suggested, in the opinion of the authors, that women in labour who have eaten solids in the last 8 h still have high-risk contents present in the stomach, and those who have a fasting duration >8 h for solids should be considered for risk stratification by gastric ultrasound before urgent general anaesthesiaLabour in absence of epiduralGastric emptyingDelay in gastric emptying with water or solids compared with patients who were not pregnant or T3Delay in gastric emptying with orange juice or coffee and milk relative to carbohydrate drinkDelay in gastric emptying with intramuscular diamorphine or meperidineLabour in presence of epiduralGastric emptyingDelay in gastric emptying with solids compared with patients who were not pregnant or T3Increase in gastric emptying with solids relative to women who were in labour without epiduralNo difference in gastric emptying with water compared with water with protein drinkConcentration of local anaesthetic in epidural solution did not affect gastric emptyingConflicting evidence in relation to influence of opioid in epidural solution on gastric emptyingDelay in gastric emptying with intrathecal local anaesthetic and opioid relative to epidural local anaesthetic and opioidPostpartumGastric emptyingIn first 5 days postpartum, gastric emptying with water was delayed in one study and not different in two studiesNo difference in gastric emptying after 6 months compared with patients who were pregnant

h intrathecal local anaesthetic and opioid relative to epidural local anaesthetic and opioidPostpartumGastric emptyingIn first 5 days postpartum, gastric emptying with water was delayed in one study and not different in two studiesNo difference in gastric emptying after 6 months compared with patients who were pregnant Summary of main findings. Inconsistencies in evidence may reflect the unpredictability of gastric emptying in pregnancy. CSA, cross sectional area; T1, first trimester; T2, second trimester; T3, third trimester.

h intrathecal local anaesthetic and opioid relative to epidural local anaesthetic and opioidPostpartumGastric emptyingIn first 5 days postpartum, gastric emptying with water was delayed in one study and not different in two studiesNo difference in gastric emptying after 6 months compared with patients who were pregnant Summary of main findings. Inconsistencies in evidence may reflect the unpredictability of gastric emptying in pregnancy. CSA, cross sectional area; T1, first trimester; T2, second trimester; T3, third trimester. Our findings indicate that, compared with patients who were not pregnant, gastric emptying was decreased in T1 and not T2 and T3. In agreement with this, the baseline gastric volume on ultrasound was not demonstrated to be different in patients who were in T3 relative to women who were not pregnant in a prospective observational study.79 Five of the six studies that assessed gastric emptying in T1, two studies in T2, and two of the eight studies that evaluated gastric emptying in T3 used the paracetamol absorption method.21,22,24,26,27 which has been validated against the gold standard of scintigraphy.80 but there are possible drawbacks to this technique. The plasma concentration of paracetamol, once absorbed, is dependent on the volume of distribution and the clearance, and these indices have been found to increase as pregnancy advances.81 Given this, the pharmacokinetics of paracetamol in women who were pregnant may have led to a reduction in the area under plasma paracetamol curve and peak plasma paracetamol concentration, predisposing towards a suggestion of delayed gastric emptying with the progression of pregnancy. Importantly, however, the results of the two studies that examined gastric emptying in T3 by paracetamol absorption21,26 were consistent with most of those that used other methods such as epigastric impedance, gastric ultrasound, nasogastric sampling, and radiotelemetry pH pill.23,25,64,71,73 In contrast to these results, increased gestational age was revealed in a prospective observational study to increase the likelihood of high-risk gastric contents on ultrasound, that is fluid >1.5 ml kg−1 or the presence of solid food, potentially due to the compression of the stomach by the gravid uterus.82

5,64,71,73 In contrast to these results, increased gestational age was revealed in a prospective observational study to increase the likelihood of high-risk gastric contents on ultrasound, that is fluid >1.5 ml kg−1 or the presence of solid food, potentially due to the compression of the stomach by the gravid uterus.82 In the context of Caesarean delivery, all of the studies investigated gastric emptying in the elective setting. These patients can hence be considered, in the opinion of the authors, to be in T3 if in the preoperative phase as they are not in labour. Of particular concern, in one prospective observational study, 51 patients in T3 were fasted after a standardised light meal for 6 h and, despite none having solid food detectable in the gastric antrum on ultrasound, 38% of women still had >1.5 ml kg−1 of fluid, the threshold below which the risk of pulmonary aspiration is minimal.83 Further, in another prospective observational study of patients admitted to the maternity unit, elective Caesarean delivery was found to decrease the likelihood of high-risk gastric contents on ultrasound, that is fluid >1.5 ml kg−1 or the presence of solid food, but, despite a median (interquartile range, IQR) fast of 7.5 (3–12) h for clear fluids and 12.75 (11.5–14.5) h for solids, 40% of women still had high-risk gastric contents.82 In contrast, in two prospective observational studies it was revealed that, following a fast of 2 h for clear fluids and 6–8 h for solids in T3 before elective Caesarean delivery, only 3.5% of 85 women84 and 5% of 103 women85 had high-risk gastric contents on ultrasound, that is fluid >1.5 ml kg−1. The findings of these studies indicate, in the opinion of the authors, that patients who have followed standard fasting guidelines for elective Caesarean delivery may still have high-risk contents present in the stomach, and gastric ultrasound should be considered in those patients in whom it has been scheduled under general anaesthesia. The risk stratification of women with gastric ultrasound may influence decision-making in the circumstances of category four Caesarean delivery, especially in relation to the choice of anaesthetic technique, and the decision to wake or proceed should failed tracheal intubation occur86 Importantly, no evidence, to the knowledge of the authors, supports the notion that prolongation of the preoperative fast in such cases necessarily results in significant emptying of these high-risk gastric contents.

of anaesthetic technique, and the decision to wake or proceed should failed tracheal intubation occur86 Importantly, no evidence, to the knowledge of the authors, supports the notion that prolongation of the preoperative fast in such cases necessarily results in significant emptying of these high-risk gastric contents. Our results provide encouragement that the ingestion of carbohydrate drink or tea with milk leads to no difference in gastric cross-sectional area at 2 h compared with continued fasting or water. Specifically, after a fast of 2 h for clear fluids, 6 h for light meal and 8 h for fatty meal, the median (IQR) gastric volume was 0.8 (0.5–1.0) ml kg−1 at baseline and 0.8 (0.6–1.1) ml kg−1 at 2 h with a range to 1.4 and 1.6 ml kg−1, respectively, following a carbohydrate drink,51 and was 0.6–0.7 (0.5–0.9) ml kg−1 at baseline and 0.7 (0.5–0.9) ml kg−1 and 0.6 (0.5–1.1) ml kg−1 at 2 h subsequent to water or tea with milk.53 The preoperative ingestion of carbohydrate drink has been advocated by SOAP as one of the elements of enhanced recovery after Caesarean delivery to decrease maternal hypoglycaemia and metabolic stress.87 In a randomised controlled trial, the ingestion of carbohydrate drink before Caesarean delivery reduced the required number of boluses and total dose of vasopressor subsequent to combined spinal epidural anaesthesia.88 Interestingly, in a prospective observational study, 58 women who were able to drink sips of water once they had been admitted to hospital and before being called for Caesarean delivery were shown to have a noninferior gastric cross-sectional area at the end of the sip-till-send period relative to when they were fully fasted.89

ngly, in a prospective observational study, 58 women who were able to drink sips of water once they had been admitted to hospital and before being called for Caesarean delivery were shown to have a noninferior gastric cross-sectional area at the end of the sip-till-send period relative to when they were fully fasted.89 In the setting of labour, a prospective observational study found that 70% and 66% of patients who were admitted to the maternity unit in spontaneous labour or for induction of labour, respectively, had high-risk gastric contents in the first hour on ultrasound, that is fluid >1.5 ml kg−1 or the presence of solid food.82 Our findings revealed that systemic opioids in the absence of epidural decreased gastric emptying. The reduction in gastric emptying in women who did not have an epidural compared with those who did was likely to be a reflection of the influence of nociceptive stimuli and pain on the activation of the autonomic nervous system and therefore gastroduodenal motility and secretion.90,91 It is probable that the use of epidural opioid in addition to local anaesthetic delays gastric emptying relative to local anaesthetic alone. Over the course of labour, a progressive decrease in solid intake has been described92 and the volume of gastric contents has been found to reduce.38 In a prospective observational study, 62 patients in labour who had an epidural with local anaesthetic and opioid were allowed to drink clear fluids but not eat any solids and, at the time of full cervical dilatation, 27% of them had high-risk gastric contents on ultrasound, that is fluid >1.5 ml kg−1 or the presence of solid food.93 The time interval between the insertion of the epidural and gastric ultrasound, possibly owing to an increased cumulative dose of epidural opioid, and the maximum pain score in the last hour of labour, but not the duration of fasting for clear fluids, were risk factors for high-risk gastric contents. These results suggest that clear fluids may be safe in labour.

he epidural and gastric ultrasound, possibly owing to an increased cumulative dose of epidural opioid, and the maximum pain score in the last hour of labour, but not the duration of fasting for clear fluids, were risk factors for high-risk gastric contents. These results suggest that clear fluids may be safe in labour. In a randomised controlled trial that compared solids and water in women who were in labour, most of whom received epidural analgesia with local anaesthetic and opioid, the gastric cross-sectional area measured within 1 h of delivery on ultrasound was increased in those who had had solids.92 Moreover, in a comparative and prospective observational study, the gastric contents were investigated in 50 patients who were in T3, not in labour, and fasted and 50 women who were in labour, the majority of whom had an epidural, and permitted unrestricted oral intake.94 The risk stomach was one in which the volume of fluid was >1.5 ml kg−1, fluid was present in the right lateral semirecumbent as well as semirecumbent position or solid food was present and occurred in 80% of patients who were in labour. Importantly, the duration of fasting for solids has been shown to be related to the risk of high-risk gastric contents.82 In spontaneous labour and induction of labour, the incidence of high-risk gastric contents on ultrasound was 85–86%, 59–68%, 55–56%, and 48–51% when the women were fasted for <6 h, ≥6 and <8 h, ≥8 and <12 h, or ≥12 h, respectively. In view of this, it should be assumed, in the opinion of the authors, that patients in labour who have eaten solids in the last 8 h still have high-risk contents present in the stomach, and those who have a fasting duration >8 h for solids should be considered for risk stratification by gastric ultrasound if time permits before urgent general anaesthesia. Sufficient time is likely to be available to perform gastric ultrasound in category two but not category one Caesarean delivery. The risk stratification of women with gastric ultrasound may influence decision-making in the situation of category two Caesarean delivery, particularly in relation to the selection of anaesthetic technique and the decision to wake or proceed should failed tracheal intubation occur.86 Surprisingly, and to mitigate some of the risk related to solid intake in labour, not all women wish to eat in labour, as underlined by the 29% of those who decided not to have solid intake in a randomised controlled trial.95

hetic technique and the decision to wake or proceed should failed tracheal intubation occur.86 Surprisingly, and to mitigate some of the risk related to solid intake in labour, not all women wish to eat in labour, as underlined by the 29% of those who decided not to have solid intake in a randomised controlled trial.95 This narrative review had many limitations. First, most studies were at moderate risk of bias. Deficiencies in the observational studies were found in the domains of confounding, missing data, and selection of the reported result. Problems in the randomised controlled trials were shown in the domains of randomisation process, deviations from the intended interventions, and selection of reported result. Second, heterogeneity was present in the characteristics of the patients and their anaesthetic and obstetric management in the different studies. Populations who tended to be excluded were those with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, obesity, and diabetes. Differences in anaesthetic management, for example, included the constituents of the epidural solution. Third, inconsistencies were present in the methods used to objectively examine gastric emptying and they all had inherent weaknesses. Gastric ultrasound is user and position dependent. In regard to paracetamol absorption, the plasma concentration is influenced by the volume of distribution and the clearance.81 Breath hydrogen analysis provides the orocaecal transit time rather than only the rate of gastric emptying.77 Fourth, the variation in results may be due to the quality of observational studies and randomised controlled trials, heterogeneity in the characteristics of the patients and their anaesthetic and obstetric management, and the unpredictability of gastric emptying in pregnancy secondary to multiple factors such as pain. This potential unpredictability highlights the possible preoperative role of gastric ultrasound in women who are pregnant and electively or urgently require general anaesthesia. Fifth, the risk of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents and the occurrence of respiratory complications is related not only to gastric emptying and thus the presence of high-risk contents in the stomach, but also other factors such as the effect of the gravid uterus on abdominal pressure, progesterone-mediated relaxation of the lower oesophageal sphincter, and reduced gastric pH.4

occurrence of respiratory complications is related not only to gastric emptying and thus the presence of high-risk contents in the stomach, but also other factors such as the effect of the gravid uterus on abdominal pressure, progesterone-mediated relaxation of the lower oesophageal sphincter, and reduced gastric pH.4 In conclusion, we have been able to summarise and review how gastric emptying varies in the different time periods of pregnancy. Compared with the nonpregnant phase, gastric emptying was decreased in T1 but not T2 and T3. In T3 and before elective Caesarean delivery, the ingestion of carbohydrate drink or tea with milk resulted in no difference in gastric cross-sectional area at 2 h relative to continued fasting or water, and the preoperative ingestion of carbohydrate should be considered in such cases to support enhanced recovery after Caesarean delivery. Compared with the nonpregnant phase and T3, gastric emptying was delayed in labour, although the choice of analgesia had modifying effects. Systemic opioids delayed gastric emptying, epidural analgesia increased it but not back to baseline, epidural analgesia with local anaesthetic and opioid either reduced gastric emptying or made no difference compared with local anaesthetic alone, and intrathecal analgesia delayed it relative to epidural analgesia. The evidence with respect to the postpartum period was conflicting. Overall, the inconsistencies in the literature may reflect the unpredictability of gastric emptying in pregnancy and underline the potential value of gastric ultrasound in women who are pregnant and electively or urgently undergo general anaesthesia.

Conceptualisation: RH, ND Search strategy development: RH, ND Data extraction: JL, RH, ND, JS, CG, PP Risk of bias: ML, DO Manuscript writing: JL, RH, ND Manuscript revision: ND, JL, RH Supervision: ND