Browse the corpus

Walk the Even Hospital Database by book and chapter — the raw source passages that ground Ask, DDx, and the rest.

5 passages

fulltextpubmed· Full Text· item 36856580

To the Editor: Several B.1.1.529 (omicron) subvariants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are emerging and have become the dominant strains, such as BF.7, BQ.1, BQ.1.1, and XBB. These variants contain more mutations in the spike protein receptor-binding domain (RBD) than the BA.2 and BA.5 strains (Figure 1A). Therefore, the potential of these omicron subvariants for immune evasion is a concern. The coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) vaccines with inactivated virus (CoronaVac and BBIBP-CorV) and the ZF2001 protein subunit vaccine1 have been widely used in China and many other countries. In this study, we obtained serum samples from vaccinees (age range, 18 to 59 years) who had received three homologous doses of ZF2001 (the ZF2001 group, 16 participants) or inactivated vaccine (the inactivated-vaccine group, 16 participants) or two doses of inactivated vaccine plus a booster dose of ZF2001 (the heterologous-boost group, 16 participants) (Fig. S1 in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org). The neutralizing activities in the serum samples from these participants were analyzed with a panel of pseudoviruses. Details of the study design are provided in the Supplementary Appendix.

fulltextpubmed· Full Text· item 36856580

us-boost group, 16 participants) (Fig. S1 in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org). The neutralizing activities in the serum samples from these participants were analyzed with a panel of pseudoviruses. Details of the study design are provided in the Supplementary Appendix. In the ZF2001 group, three doses of ZF2001 induced high titers of neutralizing antibodies against the prototype and BA.2 strains (geometric mean titer [GMT], 1302 and 252, respectively), a finding that was consistent with the results of our previous study.2 As compared with the neutralizing GMT of 181 against BA.4 and BA.5 (which have the same spike protein sequence), the neutralizing GMTs against BA.4.6 and BF.7 (which have an additional R346T mutation in the RBD) decreased to 67 and 63, respectively. Seropositivity (defined as a neutralization titer >10 [the limit of detection]) was 44% against BQ.1, 13% against BQ.1.1, and 13% against XBB, and the GMTs were below the limit of detection, indicating immune evasion of these more recent strains (Figure 1B, Figs. S2 and S3, and Table S1). In the inactivated-vaccine group, the neutralizing GMT was 131 against the prototype isolate, 29 against BA.2, and 26 against BA.4 and BA.5. However, neutralization activities against BA.2.3.20, BA.4.6, BF.7, BQ.1, and BQ.1.1 were at background levels, and no serum sample showed neutralization activity against XBB (Figure 1C).

fulltextpubmed· Full Text· item 36856580

nactivated-vaccine group, the neutralizing GMT was 131 against the prototype isolate, 29 against BA.2, and 26 against BA.4 and BA.5. However, neutralization activities against BA.2.3.20, BA.4.6, BF.7, BQ.1, and BQ.1.1 were at background levels, and no serum sample showed neutralization activity against XBB (Figure 1C). In the heterologous-boost group, the neutralization profile of the serum samples was similar to that in the ZF2001 group. The neutralizing GMT was 812 against the prototype isolate, 60 against BA.2, 15 against BA.2.3.20, 27 against BA.4 and BA.5, 20 against BA.4.6, and 22 against BF.7. In addition, seropositivity for neutralizing antibodies was 13% against XBB, 13% against BQ.1, and 13% against BQ.1.1 (Figure 1D). These results indicated that BQ.1, BQ.1.1, and XBB showed strong resistance to the vaccine-elicited humoral immunity, a finding that was consistent with the results of another recent analysis.3 Recently, we engineered the homotypic RBD-dimer immunogen4 (which is used in the ZF2001 vaccine) and designed heterotypic chimeric RBD dimers, including prototype–B.1.351 (beta) and B.1.617.2 (delta)–omicron vaccine candidates. They induced relatively broad immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants.5 In the current study, we tested their neutralizing activities in murine serum samples. BA.2 RBD homodimer and delta–BA.2 RBD heterodimer were also included as comparators (Figure 1E).

fulltextpubmed· Full Text· item 36856580

51 (beta) and B.1.617.2 (delta)–omicron vaccine candidates. They induced relatively broad immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants.5 In the current study, we tested their neutralizing activities in murine serum samples. BA.2 RBD homodimer and delta–BA.2 RBD heterodimer were also included as comparators (Figure 1E). The results showed that XBB and BQ.1.1 strongly escape the antibody responses induced by the prototype RBD homodimer (Figure 1F and Fig. S4). For the BA.2 RBD homodimer, the neutralizing GMTs were more than 105 against BA.1, BA.2, and BA.4 and BA.5; between 104 and 105 against the prototype isolate, beta, delta, BA.2.75, BA.2.3.20, BA.4.6, and BF.7; approximately 103 against BQ.1 and BQ.1.1; and 393 against XBB (Figure 1G). The prototype–beta RBD heterodimer could induce high neutralizing GMTs against the currently circulating BF.7, which probably resulted from the K417N, E484K, and N501Y substitutions in beta RBD (Figure 1H). In comparison, delta–BA.1 and delta–BA.2 RBD heterodimers induced balanced neutralization profiles against the early circulating strains (such as the prototype, beta, and delta) and omicron subvariants (Figure 1I and 1J).

fulltextpubmed· Full Text· item 36856580

7, which probably resulted from the K417N, E484K, and N501Y substitutions in beta RBD (Figure 1H). In comparison, delta–BA.1 and delta–BA.2 RBD heterodimers induced balanced neutralization profiles against the early circulating strains (such as the prototype, beta, and delta) and omicron subvariants (Figure 1I and 1J). The currently circulating omicron subvariants, especially BQ.1, BQ.1.1, and XBB, showed immune escape to the humoral immunity elicited by prototype strain sequence-based vaccines, such as inactivated vaccine and ZF2001. Our study showed that next-generation and updated Covid-19 vaccines are needed for better protection and pandemic control. Our newly updated delta–omicron BA.1 and BA.2 RBD heterodimers had high neutralizing activities against the emerging omicron subvariants. An analysis of clinical data regarding the delta–omicron BA.1 RBD-dimer vaccine ZF2202 is currently under way (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05616754).