Browse the corpus

Randomized Trial of Fetal Surgery for Severe Left Diaphragmatic Hernia. BACKGROUND: Observational studies have shown that fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion (FETO) has been associated with increased survival among infants with severe pulmonary hypoplasia due to isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia on the left side, but data from randomized trials are lacking. METHODS: In this open-label trial conducted at centers with experience in FETO and other types of prenatal surgery, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, women carrying singleton fetuses with severe isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia on the left side to FETO at 27 to 29 weeks of gestation or expectant care. Both treatments were followed by standardized postnatal care. The primary outcome was infant survival to discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit. We used a group-sequential design with five prespecified interim analyses for superiority, with a maximum sample size of 116 women. RESULTS: The trial was stopped early for efficacy after the third interim analysis. In an intention-to-treat analysis that included 80 women, 40% of infants (16 of 40) in the FETO group survived to discharge, as compared with 15% (6 of 40) in the expectant care group (relative risk, 2.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22 to 6.11; two-sided P = 0.009). Survival to 6 months of age was identical to the survival to discharge (relative risk, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.22 to 6.11). The incidence of preterm, prelabor rupture of membranes was higher among women in the FETO group than among those in the expectant care group (47% vs. 11%; relative risk, 4.51; 95% CI, 1.83 to 11.9), as was the incidence of preterm birth (75% vs. 29%; relative risk, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.59 to 4.52). One neonatal death occurred after emergency delivery for placental laceration from fetoscopic balloon removal, and one neonatal death occurred because of failed balloon removal. In an analysis that included 11 additional participants with data that were available after the trial was stopped, survival to discharge was 36% among infants in the FETO group and 14% among those in the expectant care group (relative risk, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.21 to 6.09). CONCLUSIONS: In fetuses with isolated severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia on the left side, FETO performed at 27 to 29 weeks of gestation resulted in a significant benefit over expectant care with respect to survival to discharge, and this benefit was sustained to 6 months of age. FETO increased the risks of preterm, prelabor rupture of membranes and preterm birth. (Funded by the European Commission and others; TOTAL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01240057.).

This open-label, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group, superiority trial was conducted at 10 FETO centers and 26 neonatal care centers in Belgium, the United Kingdom, France, Spain, Canada, Italy, Japan, the United States, Germany, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and Poland (see Table S1 in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org). To participate, FETO centers were required to have performed a minimum of 36 fetoscopies per year (irrespective of indication), to have performed a minimum of 15 FETO procedures at the time the first participant was recruited, and to have experience with standardized assessment of fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.24

ipate, FETO centers were required to have performed a minimum of 36 fetoscopies per year (irrespective of indication), to have performed a minimum of 15 FETO procedures at the time the first participant was recruited, and to have experience with standardized assessment of fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.24 All the women were assessed for eligibility at the FETO centers. The inclusion criteria were a maternal age of 18 years or more, singleton pregnancy, gestational age at randomization of less than 29 weeks 6 days, congenital diaphragmatic hernia on the left side with no other major structural or chromosomal defects, and severe pulmonary hypoplasia, defined as a quotient of the observed-to-expected lung-to-head ratios of less than 25.0%, irrespective of liver position.8,24 The exclusion criteria were maternal conditions that would make fetal surgery risky, technical limitations precluding fetal surgery (including those caused by severe maternal obesity or uterine fibroids), an elevated risk of preterm birth (cervical length <15 mm, müllerian anomalies, or placenta previa), and psychological, socioeconomic, or other factors that might prevent adherence to the protocol, which is available at NEJM.org. We kept a log of eligible nonparticipants and their outcomes.

besity or uterine fibroids), an elevated risk of preterm birth (cervical length <15 mm, müllerian anomalies, or placenta previa), and psychological, socioeconomic, or other factors that might prevent adherence to the protocol, which is available at NEJM.org. We kept a log of eligible nonparticipants and their outcomes. Eligible women received multidisciplinary counseling and standard information on congenital diaphragmatic hernia and FETO,25 as well as information about the concept of a randomized trial. Fetoscopic placement of a tracheal balloon was carried out at 27 weeks 0 days to 29 weeks 6 days of gestation. Reversal of occlusion, either by fetoscopy or by ultrasound-guided puncture of the balloon, was scheduled at 34 weeks 0 days to 34 weeks 6 days of gestation.26 The women who were assigned to FETO agreed to live near the FETO center for the duration of tracheal occlusion. If preterm birth was imminent, emergency balloon retrieval was performed in utero (as described above), at the time of delivery while the umbilical cord still connected the infant to the placenta, or by direct puncture immediately after delivery.27 After balloon removal, the women were given the option of either delivering in the FETO center or returning home for delivery in their local tertiary referral hospital. In either case, postnatal care was standardized according to international consensus guidelines and was the same for both groups.21,22

fter delivery.27 After balloon removal, the women were given the option of either delivering in the FETO center or returning home for delivery in their local tertiary referral hospital. In either case, postnatal care was standardized according to international consensus guidelines and was the same for both groups.21,22 Approval for the trial was obtained from the relevant research ethics committees and competent authorities in each country. The statistical analysis plan is available with the protocol. The first author vouches for the fidelity of the trial to the protocol and for the accuracy and completeness of the data.28 After assessment for eligibility, women were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to one of the two treatment groups, without stratification factors. Randomization was performed by a fetal medicine specialist using a purposely developed secure website. Block randomization was used for an equal distribution per group at every analysis. The randomization sequence was generated by the statistician. The primary outcome was survival to discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Secondary and exploratory outcomes were operative and pregnancy complications, fetal survival, survival to 6 months of age, and neonatal complications (Table S2).

After assessment for eligibility, women were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to one of the two treatment groups, without stratification factors. Randomization was performed by a fetal medicine specialist using a purposely developed secure website. Block randomization was used for an equal distribution per group at every analysis. The randomization sequence was generated by the statistician. The primary outcome was survival to discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Secondary and exploratory outcomes were operative and pregnancy complications, fetal survival, survival to 6 months of age, and neonatal complications (Table S2). We used a group-sequential design and five interim analyses to allow for early stopping for superiority, with a two-sided alpha level of 5% with O’Brien–Fleming stopping rules and a power of 80%.29 On the basis of previous studies, the sample-size calculation assumed that survival to discharge from the NICU would be 50% in the FETO group and 25% in the expectant care group.8,20 A total of 116 participants (58 in each group) would be required if the trial was not stopped early. No formal boundaries for futility were considered.

f previous studies, the sample-size calculation assumed that survival to discharge from the NICU would be 50% in the FETO group and 25% in the expectant care group.8,20 A total of 116 participants (58 in each group) would be required if the trial was not stopped early. No formal boundaries for futility were considered. We analyzed the primary outcome using the z test for unpaired proportions according to the intention-to-treat principle. A secondary analysis was performed according to the per-protocol principle. No formal significance testing was performed in the analyses of the secondary and exploratory outcomes. We report relative risks, differences in percentages, and differences in medians with 95% confidence intervals because there was no adjustment for multiplicity in the analyses of secondary and exploratory outcomes. These confidence intervals should not be used to infer definitive treatment effects. Because the trial was stopped early, we later performed post hoc analyses that included participants who had undergone randomization but for whom outcome data were not yet available at the time of the third interim analysis; these participants were referred to as “overrunning participants.”30 The statistical analysis plan and additional details regarding sample-size considerations for the primary outcome are provided in the protocol.

fter delivery.27 After balloon removal, the women were given the option of either delivering in the FETO center or returning home for delivery in their local tertiary referral hospital. In either case, postnatal care was standardized according to international consensus guidelines and was the same for both groups.21,22 Approval for the trial was obtained from the relevant research ethics committees and competent authorities in each country. The statistical analysis plan is available with the protocol. The first author vouches for the fidelity of the trial to the protocol and for the accuracy and completeness of the data.28

After assessment for eligibility, women were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to one of the two treatment groups, without stratification factors. Randomization was performed by a fetal medicine specialist using a purposely developed secure website. Block randomization was used for an equal distribution per group at every analysis. The randomization sequence was generated by the statistician.

The primary outcome was survival to discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Secondary and exploratory outcomes were operative and pregnancy complications, fetal survival, survival to 6 months of age, and neonatal complications (Table S2).

We used a group-sequential design and five interim analyses to allow for early stopping for superiority, with a two-sided alpha level of 5% with O’Brien–Fleming stopping rules and a power of 80%.29 On the basis of previous studies, the sample-size calculation assumed that survival to discharge from the NICU would be 50% in the FETO group and 25% in the expectant care group.8,20 A total of 116 participants (58 in each group) would be required if the trial was not stopped early. No formal boundaries for futility were considered. We analyzed the primary outcome using the z test for unpaired proportions according to the intention-to-treat principle. A secondary analysis was performed according to the per-protocol principle. No formal significance testing was performed in the analyses of the secondary and exploratory outcomes. We report relative risks, differences in percentages, and differences in medians with 95% confidence intervals because there was no adjustment for multiplicity in the analyses of secondary and exploratory outcomes. These confidence intervals should not be used to infer definitive treatment effects. Because the trial was stopped early, we later performed post hoc analyses that included participants who had undergone randomization but for whom outcome data were not yet available at the time of the third interim analysis; these participants were referred to as “overrunning participants.”30 The statistical analysis plan and additional details regarding sample-size considerations for the primary outcome are provided in the protocol.

Starting in February 2011, a total of 1314 women carrying fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia underwent preliminary assessment, and 167 met the inclusion criteria; of these women, 95 (57%) provided written informed consent to participate and were assigned to FETO (47 women) or expectant care (48 women) (Fig. 1). Four participants subsequently withdrew consent for participation and data collection. On March 3, 2020, the data and safety monitoring committee stopped the trial for efficacy at the third interim analysis, and enrollment was stopped. The results in 80 participants (40 in each group) are the primary focus of the current article. There were no obvious differences between the FETO group and the expectant care group with respect to baseline characteristics (Table 1). In the FETO group, the balloon was successfully inserted into the trachea in all fetuses (Fig. 2). In most cases, the procedure was carried out while the women were under local or regional anesthesia, but two women received general anesthesia because of anxiety (Table S3).

Starting in February 2011, a total of 1314 women carrying fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia underwent preliminary assessment, and 167 met the inclusion criteria; of these women, 95 (57%) provided written informed consent to participate and were assigned to FETO (47 women) or expectant care (48 women) (Fig. 1). Four participants subsequently withdrew consent for participation and data collection. On March 3, 2020, the data and safety monitoring committee stopped the trial for efficacy at the third interim analysis, and enrollment was stopped. The results in 80 participants (40 in each group) are the primary focus of the current article. There were no obvious differences between the FETO group and the expectant care group with respect to baseline characteristics (Table 1). In the FETO group, the balloon was successfully inserted into the trachea in all fetuses (Fig. 2). In most cases, the procedure was carried out while the women were under local or regional anesthesia, but two women received general anesthesia because of anxiety (Table S3). No maternal complications occurred during FETO. There were five spontaneous balloon deflations. In 1 participant, a new balloon was inserted at the time deflation was identified (at 29 weeks 3 days of gestation), but this balloon spontaneously deflated 1 week later. In the other participants, balloon deflation was detected just before removal (at 33 weeks 1 day) or during removal (at 30 weeks 2 days, 34 weeks 0 days, and 34 weeks 2 days). In 4 participants, removal was not attempted because the parents opted for withdrawal of care (in 2 participants) or because balloon deflation was detected before planned removal (in 2 participants). The balloon was removed as originally planned during the 34th week of gestation in 22 of 38 participants (58%); but in 14 participants (37%), balloon removal was performed earlier than planned, mainly because the mothers had spontaneous onset of labor or preterm, prelabor rupture of membranes. The median interval between balloon insertion and removal was 34 days (interquartile range, 28 to 39), and the median change in the quotient of the observed-to-expected lung-to-head ratios from baseline was 67.0% (interquartile range, 24 to 121). In 38% of participants, delivery occurred within 24 hours after balloon removal. The preferred method for balloon removal was fetoscopy, but in 10 of 38 participants (26%), alternative methods were used (Table S3).

of the observed-to-expected lung-to-head ratios from baseline was 67.0% (interquartile range, 24 to 121). In 38% of participants, delivery occurred within 24 hours after balloon removal. The preferred method for balloon removal was fetoscopy, but in 10 of 38 participants (26%), alternative methods were used (Table S3). A total of 16 of 40 infants (40%) in the FETO group and 6 of 40 infants (15%) in the expectant care group survived to discharge from the NICU (relative risk, 2.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22 to 6.11; P = 0.009) (Table 2). The per-protocol analysis yielded similar results: 16 of 39 infants (41%) in the FETO group and 6 of 38 infants (16%) in the expectant care group survived to discharge from the NICU (relative risk, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.19 to 5.93). In the intention-to-treat analysis, one neonatal death occurred after emergency delivery because of fetoscopic placental laceration from balloon removal, and one neonatal death occurred due to problems associated with balloon removal.

roup survived to discharge from the NICU (relative risk, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.19 to 5.93). In the intention-to-treat analysis, one neonatal death occurred after emergency delivery because of fetoscopic placental laceration from balloon removal, and one neonatal death occurred due to problems associated with balloon removal. Survival to 6 months of age was identical to the survival to discharge from the NICU (relative risk, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.22 to 6.11). Preterm, prelabor rupture of membranes occurred in 19 of 40 women (47%) in the FETO group and in 4 of 38 (11%) in the expectant care group (relative risk, 4.51; 95% CI, 1.83 to 11.9). Preterm birth occurred in 30 of 40 women (75%) in the FETO group and in 11 of 38 women (29%) in the expectant care group (relative risk, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.59 to 4.52). The median gestational age at delivery was 34 weeks 4 days and 38 weeks 3 days in the two groups, respectively, and the median birth weight in the FETO group was 481 g lower than that in the expectant care group (Table 3). There were no obvious between-group differences in the incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes. Results for outcomes in infants who survived to discharge from the NICU are reported in Table S4; these results are presented descriptively because they are not representative of the assigned intervention and are subject to bias. Table S5 shows details regarding the chromosomal or structural defects that were not recognized at randomization (in 2 infants in the FETO group and in 1 in the expectant care group).

S4; these results are presented descriptively because they are not representative of the assigned intervention and are subject to bias. Table S5 shows details regarding the chromosomal or structural defects that were not recognized at randomization (in 2 infants in the FETO group and in 1 in the expectant care group). Table 3 shows the adverse events that occurred in the safety population, which included all the participants who underwent randomization and received the prenatal intervention to which they were assigned. Aside from preterm, prelabor rupture of membranes and preterm delivery, there was one case of placental abruption in each group: one case occurred 22 days (30 weeks 5 days) after FETO and 3 days after membrane rupture, and one case occurred at 35 weeks 3 days in the expectant care group. In the FETO group, there was one case of procedure-related placental laceration from fetoscopic balloon removal, leading to hemorrhage, fetal bradycardia, delivery by emergency cesarean section, and neonatal death during resuscitation. One participant, who moved away from the FETO center, presented to her local unit at 33 weeks 6 days of gestation in preterm labor and with intact membranes; postnatal puncture was unsuccessful and resulted in neonatal death. Tracheomalacia was diagnosed at 10 months of age in one infant; this child, who was still dependent on oxygen at 3 years of age, had a complex postnatal course, including assisted ventilation for 240 days and two cardiac operations for a ventricular septal defect that was not detected before birth.

d in neonatal death. Tracheomalacia was diagnosed at 10 months of age in one infant; this child, who was still dependent on oxygen at 3 years of age, had a complex postnatal course, including assisted ventilation for 240 days and two cardiac operations for a ventricular septal defect that was not detected before birth. The baseline characteristics of the mothers and infants and the results of post hoc analyses (including the “overrunning” population) are provided in Tables S6 through S10. Among all those infants, the survival to discharge was 36% in the FETO group and 14% in the expectant care group (relative risk, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.21 to 6.09; P = 0.01). Results for 71 eligible participants who did not undergo randomization are shown in Figure S1.

A total of 16 of 40 infants (40%) in the FETO group and 6 of 40 infants (15%) in the expectant care group survived to discharge from the NICU (relative risk, 2.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22 to 6.11; P = 0.009) (Table 2). The per-protocol analysis yielded similar results: 16 of 39 infants (41%) in the FETO group and 6 of 38 infants (16%) in the expectant care group survived to discharge from the NICU (relative risk, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.19 to 5.93). In the intention-to-treat analysis, one neonatal death occurred after emergency delivery because of fetoscopic placental laceration from balloon removal, and one neonatal death occurred due to problems associated with balloon removal.

Survival to 6 months of age was identical to the survival to discharge from the NICU (relative risk, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.22 to 6.11). Preterm, prelabor rupture of membranes occurred in 19 of 40 women (47%) in the FETO group and in 4 of 38 (11%) in the expectant care group (relative risk, 4.51; 95% CI, 1.83 to 11.9). Preterm birth occurred in 30 of 40 women (75%) in the FETO group and in 11 of 38 women (29%) in the expectant care group (relative risk, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.59 to 4.52). The median gestational age at delivery was 34 weeks 4 days and 38 weeks 3 days in the two groups, respectively, and the median birth weight in the FETO group was 481 g lower than that in the expectant care group (Table 3). There were no obvious between-group differences in the incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes. Results for outcomes in infants who survived to discharge from the NICU are reported in Table S4; these results are presented descriptively because they are not representative of the assigned intervention and are subject to bias. Table S5 shows details regarding the chromosomal or structural defects that were not recognized at randomization (in 2 infants in the FETO group and in 1 in the expectant care group).

Table 3 shows the adverse events that occurred in the safety population, which included all the participants who underwent randomization and received the prenatal intervention to which they were assigned. Aside from preterm, prelabor rupture of membranes and preterm delivery, there was one case of placental abruption in each group: one case occurred 22 days (30 weeks 5 days) after FETO and 3 days after membrane rupture, and one case occurred at 35 weeks 3 days in the expectant care group. In the FETO group, there was one case of procedure-related placental laceration from fetoscopic balloon removal, leading to hemorrhage, fetal bradycardia, delivery by emergency cesarean section, and neonatal death during resuscitation. One participant, who moved away from the FETO center, presented to her local unit at 33 weeks 6 days of gestation in preterm labor and with intact membranes; postnatal puncture was unsuccessful and resulted in neonatal death. Tracheomalacia was diagnosed at 10 months of age in one infant; this child, who was still dependent on oxygen at 3 years of age, had a complex postnatal course, including assisted ventilation for 240 days and two cardiac operations for a ventricular septal defect that was not detected before birth.

The baseline characteristics of the mothers and infants and the results of post hoc analyses (including the “overrunning” population) are provided in Tables S6 through S10. Among all those infants, the survival to discharge was 36% in the FETO group and 14% in the expectant care group (relative risk, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.21 to 6.09; P = 0.01). Results for 71 eligible participants who did not undergo randomization are shown in Figure S1.

In this multicenter, randomized trial involving women carrying singleton fetuses with severe pulmonary hypoplasia due to isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia on the left side, prenatal intervention with FETO at 27 to 29 weeks of gestation resulted in significantly higher survival to discharge from the NICU than expectant care (40% vs. 15%). The higher survival in the FETO group was sustained at 6 months of age. However, the risk of preterm, prelabor rupture of membranes was 4.5 times as high in the FETO group as in the expectant care group, and the risk of preterm birth was 2.6 times as high as in the FETO group. No other serious complications occurred in the women, and there were no obvious between-group differences in the duration of stay in the NICU, the duration of ventilatory support, or the incidence of complications related to preterm birth. However, the trial was not powered for these secondary outcomes.

the FETO group. No other serious complications occurred in the women, and there were no obvious between-group differences in the duration of stay in the NICU, the duration of ventilatory support, or the incidence of complications related to preterm birth. However, the trial was not powered for these secondary outcomes. Previous studies have suggested that FETO improves survival among infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Two small, single-center, randomized trials compared fetal tracheal occlusion with expectant care during pregnancy. The first trial included extraluminal or endoluminal tracheal occlusion in 11 fetuses after the mother had undergone laparotomy under general anesthesia and 13 women who received expectant care.31 Infants in the tracheal occlusion group were delivered significantly earlier than those with mothers who had received expectant care, but survival was similar in both groups; however, many of the fetuses had not met the current criteria for severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia, as used in the current trial.8,32 The second trial involved FETO at 26 to 30 weeks of gestation in 19 fetuses and 19 women who received expectant care33; severe hypoplasia was required for eligibility. Infant survival was substantially higher in the FETO group than in the expectant care group (52.6% vs. 5.6%). However, there are some concerns regarding the methods used in the trial, such as the inclusion of fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia on the right side and the fact that severity assessment was not corrected for gestational age.34 The magnitude of the increase in survival in the FETO group in the current trial is consistent with previous observational data.11,20,35–37 The survival of 15% in the expectant care group was similar to the anticipated survival of 18% on the basis of the quotient of the observed-to-expected lung-to-head ratios at randomization.8 Among infants in the expectant care group whose mothers did not undergo randomization, survival was 31% (Fig. S1), but the quotient of the observed-to-expected lung-to-head ratios among these infants was indicative of less severe disease than that among infants whose mothers underwent randomization. In addition, data on pregnancy terminations, preterm births, and fetal abnormalities diagnosed after birth were not available for mothers who did not undergo randomization.

pected lung-to-head ratios among these infants was indicative of less severe disease than that among infants whose mothers underwent randomization. In addition, data on pregnancy terminations, preterm births, and fetal abnormalities diagnosed after birth were not available for mothers who did not undergo randomization. Similar considerations apply to other multicenter studies38 — including one that used the same postnatal care protocol as that used in the current trial22,39 — that showed slightly higher survival in infants with severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia who received expectant care (21 to 25%) than that in the expectant care group in the current trial.

other multicenter studies38 — including one that used the same postnatal care protocol as that used in the current trial22,39 — that showed slightly higher survival in infants with severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia who received expectant care (21 to 25%) than that in the expectant care group in the current trial. FETO is minimally invasive and has not appeared to have had adverse effects on long-term reproductive outcomes40; however, the procedure may not be successful, and it could potentially cause maternal and fetal complications.41 The most feared adverse event is an inability to remove the balloon, leading to rapid neonatal death. We previously reported that this is more likely to occur if balloon removal becomes an emergency, rather than being performed as an elective procedure.20 Balloons were removed in nine fetuses at a non-FETO center by an inexperienced team, and the removal was problematic in three of these fetuses.27 In the current trial, we requested that the participants live near the FETO center during the occlusion period. One mother had moved away, and delivery at a non-FETO center was complicated by failed balloon removal and resulted in neonatal death. We identified five spontaneous balloon deflations; these deflations could potentially compromise any intended therapeutic effect. We and others have previously reported spontaneous balloon deflations, despite testing of both the balloon and the valve before insertion.20,27 Our use of the balloon is “off-label”; the indicated use is in an endovascular occlusion system, in which late deflation does not have clinically significant consequences.

ect. We and others have previously reported spontaneous balloon deflations, despite testing of both the balloon and the valve before insertion.20,27 Our use of the balloon is “off-label”; the indicated use is in an endovascular occlusion system, in which late deflation does not have clinically significant consequences. Other than preterm, prelabor rupture of membranes (in 47% of participants) and premature birth (in 75%), we did not observe maternal complications with FETO, a finding consistent with our earlier experience.20 In a systematic review reporting on 634 FETO procedures, the next most common and potentially severe complication was chorioamnionitis, which was reported in 1.1% of the women.41

pants) and premature birth (in 75%), we did not observe maternal complications with FETO, a finding consistent with our earlier experience.20 In a systematic review reporting on 634 FETO procedures, the next most common and potentially severe complication was chorioamnionitis, which was reported in 1.1% of the women.41 Limitations of our trial should be noted. A long time period was required to complete the trial, during which the protocols for postnatal care of congenital diaphragmatic hernia may have changed; however, this would not differentially have affected outcomes between the two treatment groups. In addition, management teams were aware of group assignments, but this is unlikely to have affected outcomes. We have information only on short-term outcomes; further study is needed to assess longer-term outcomes after FETO as compared with expectant care for severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Although we did not find an increased incidence of adverse outcomes associated with preterm birth in the FETO group, our trial was not powered for these outcomes or for uncommon fetal or maternal complications. Because the trial involved experienced fetal surgery units, the findings should not be generalized to centers without extensive experience in fetoscopy and FETO or to centers that cannot ensure availability of a team that can perform safe and effective balloon retrieval.

or for uncommon fetal or maternal complications. Because the trial involved experienced fetal surgery units, the findings should not be generalized to centers without extensive experience in fetoscopy and FETO or to centers that cannot ensure availability of a team that can perform safe and effective balloon retrieval. This trial involving fetuses with isolated severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia on the left side showed that FETO resulted in increased survival to hospital discharge (and this increase was sustained in the cohort of infants until 6 months of age) but an increased risk of preterm, prelabor rupture of membranes and preterm birth.