Browse the corpus

Clavicle fractures are common injuries, representing up to 10% of all fractures and occurring more frequently in children than any other fracture type. These injuries most often result from a fall onto the lateral shoulder, which transmits force along the length of the bone. Patients typically present with localized pain, swelling, deformity, and limited shoulder motion. Radiographs confirm the diagnosis and assist in determining fracture location, displacement, and comminution, which guide management decisions. Most clavicle fractures are managed conservatively with sling immobilization, activity modification, and progressive rehabilitation. However, emerging literature indicates that significantly displaced fractures may benefit from operative fixation to reduce the risk of nonunion and improve functional outcomes. Appropriate assessment requires careful evaluation of neurovascular status, skin integrity, and associated injuries, particularly in high-energy trauma. The course provides a comprehensive review of the etiology, clinical presentation, imaging evaluation, and management strategies for clavicular fractures. Emphasis is placed on evidence-based decision-making and the evolving indications for surgical versus nonoperative care. Participants gain insight into rehabilitation principles, expected recovery timelines, and criteria for return to activity. The activity highlights the essential role of interprofessional collaboration, demonstrating how coordinated care among primary clinicians, nurses, radiologic technologists, and physical therapists enhances diagnostic accuracy, streamlines treatment planning, and optimizes functional recovery. Through this team-based approach, patient education improves, complications are identified earlier, and outcomes are strengthened across the continuum of care. Objectives: Differentiate mechanisms of injury and epidemiologic patterns associated with clavicle fractures across age groups and activity levels to inform risk assessment and clinical evaluation. Assess appropriate imaging modalities and clinical criteria to evaluate clavicle fractures, determine fracture characteristics, and identify complications such as displacement, nonunion, and neurovascular compromise.

Differentiate mechanisms of injury and epidemiologic patterns associated with clavicle fractures across age groups and activity levels to inform risk assessment and clinical evaluation. Assess appropriate imaging modalities and clinical criteria to evaluate clavicle fractures, determine fracture characteristics, and identify complications such as displacement, nonunion, and neurovascular compromise. Evaluate surgical and nonsurgical treatment strategies for clavicle fractures by considering fracture type, displacement, location, patient activity level, and emerging classification systems to guide evidence-based management decisions. Coordinate interprofessional team-based care plans to optimize outcomes and rehabilitation in patients with clavicle fractures, including surgical follow-up, pain management, and return-to-activity considerations. Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.

Fractures of the clavicle are quite common, accounting for up to 10% of all fractures.[1] A clavicle fracture is the most common fracture of childhood and is most frequently caused by a fall onto the lateral shoulder (see Image. Clavicle Fracture After a Fall from a Ladder). Radiographs confirm the diagnosis and aid in further evaluation and treatment. While most clavicle fractures are treated conservatively, recent literature suggests that operative treatment may more effectively prevent nonunion in displaced fractures.[2]

In 87% of reported cases, a clavicle fracture results from a fall directly onto the lateral shoulder. Less commonly, fractures may result from direct trauma to the clavicle or from a fall onto an outstretched hand.

Clavicle fractures represent 2% to 10% of all fractures and affect approximately 1 in 1000 people per year. They are the most common fractures in childhood, with approximately two-thirds occurring in men. There is a bimodal age distribution among men with clavicle fractures, with peaks at ages younger than 25 years (most commonly due to sports-related injuries) and older than 55 years (most commonly due to falls).[3] Approximately 20% of women and more than one-third of men with clavicular fractures are between 13 and 20 years old.[4] The middle third of the clavicle is fractured in 69% of cases, the distal third is fractured in 28% of cases, and the proximal third is fractured in 3% of cases.[4] The middle third of the clavicle accounts for 95% of fractures in children. In children younger than 10, these fractures are frequently nondisplaced, whereas in children older than 10, the majority are displaced. Clavicle fractures represent 95% of fractures seen during childbirth.[5][6][7]

The clavicle is an S-shaped bone and is the only osseous link between the upper extremity and the trunk. The clavicle articulates distally with the acromion at the acromioclavicular joint and articulates proximally with the sternum at the sternoclavicular joint. Due to its superficial subcutaneous location and the numerous ligamentous and muscular forces applied to it, the clavicle is easily fractured. Because the midshaft of the clavicle is the thinnest segment and does not contain ligamentous attachments, it is the most easily fractured aspect of the clavicle. Fractures of the clavicle are typically classified according to the Allman classification system, which divides the clavicle into 3 groups based on location. Fractures of the middle third, or midshaft, are classified as Group I (the most common); distal or lateral third as Group II; and proximal or medial third as Group III.[8] Neer has further revised the Allman classification and includes the following: Type 1 fracture is where there is minimal displacement. These fractures occur just lateral to the intact coracoclavicular ligament and are managed nonsurgically. Type 2 fracture occurs when the medial fragment is separated from the coracoclavicular complex. The fragment is displaced inferiorly due to the pull of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. The distal fragment is displaced cranially. This fracture results in an obvious deformity and is associated with a high rate of nonunion. Type 3 fracture is characterized by nondisplacement of the fracture but by its extension into the acromioclavicular joint. Again, these fractures are typically treated nonsurgically. However, late acromioclavicular degenerative changes can occur and may require excision of the distal clavicular segment.[9]

Type 2 fracture occurs when the medial fragment is separated from the coracoclavicular complex. The fragment is displaced inferiorly due to the pull of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. The distal fragment is displaced cranially. This fracture results in an obvious deformity and is associated with a high rate of nonunion. Type 3 fracture is characterized by nondisplacement of the fracture but by its extension into the acromioclavicular joint. Again, these fractures are typically treated nonsurgically. However, late acromioclavicular degenerative changes can occur and may require excision of the distal clavicular segment.[9] Emerging classification systems such as Xue and Cho, which stratify fractures by location, displacement, and comminution to guide surgical decision-making, alongside outcome-focused thresholds described by von Rüden et al, support a more personalized approach to clavicle fracture treatment planning.[10][11] In a multicenter retrospective study of 1075 patients with distal clavicle fractures, Xue et al proposed a novel classification system that stratifies fractures based on their anatomical relationship to coracoclavicular ligament footprints and the presence of ligament disruption. This system, which divides injuries into 2 primary types with multiple subtypes, demonstrated high inter and intraobserver reliability and excellent agreement in treatment choice. Importantly, the classification directly informs management. Type I fractures, which involve minimal displacement and preserved ligament integrity, are often treated nonoperatively, whereas Types II and certain Type I subtypes with significant displacement or ligament disruption more frequently require surgical fixation. These findings support the clinical relevance of this system in standardizing and personalizing treatment planning. Many important structures are adjacent to the clavicle and thus are at risk of injury in a fracture. Notably, the subclavian artery passes anterior to the first rib and is in close proximity to the middle segment of the clavicle, while the brachial plexus also courses behind the clavicle and is at risk when there is a fracture of the middle clavicle.

Emerging classification systems such as Xue and Cho, which stratify fractures by location, displacement, and comminution to guide surgical decision-making, alongside outcome-focused thresholds described by von Rüden et al, support a more personalized approach to clavicle fracture treatment planning.[10][11] In a multicenter retrospective study of 1075 patients with distal clavicle fractures, Xue et al proposed a novel classification system that stratifies fractures based on their anatomical relationship to coracoclavicular ligament footprints and the presence of ligament disruption. This system, which divides injuries into 2 primary types with multiple subtypes, demonstrated high inter and intraobserver reliability and excellent agreement in treatment choice. Importantly, the classification directly informs management. Type I fractures, which involve minimal displacement and preserved ligament integrity, are often treated nonoperatively, whereas Types II and certain Type I subtypes with significant displacement or ligament disruption more frequently require surgical fixation. These findings support the clinical relevance of this system in standardizing and personalizing treatment planning. Many important structures are adjacent to the clavicle and thus are at risk of injury in a fracture. Notably, the subclavian artery passes anterior to the first rib and is in close proximity to the middle segment of the clavicle, while the brachial plexus also courses behind the clavicle and is at risk when there is a fracture of the middle clavicle. More than 85% of clavicular fractures occur from a fall onto the shoulder.[12] Most of these fractures among the young occur in traffic accidents or are sports-related.[4] Approximately 40% of injuries caused by traffic accidents occur in cyclists, more than 25% in car drivers or passengers, 17% in motorcyclists, and 17% in pedestrians.[4] There seems to be no correlation between the clavicular fracture site and the mechanism of injury.[12] Clavicle fractures do occur in isolation, but when there is a high-energy injury, one should always look for associated injuries, including pneumothorax, hemothorax, and head trauma.

Patients with clavicle fractures typically present with well-localized pain over the fracture site. The affected extremity is typically held close to the body. Patients may report a snapping or cracking sound at the time of injury. The most common reported mechanism is a fall onto the lateral shoulder (see Image. Clavicle Fracture). A direct blow to the clavicle or a fall on an outstretched hand are less common mechanisms of injury. On physical examination, the patient may present with a visible or palpable deformity over the fracture site. The shoulder is typically pulled downward in patients with fractures of the middle third of the clavicle, due to the effect of the pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi muscles on the distal fragment. The sternocleidomastoid displaces the proximal fragment upward. There may be localized tenderness, crepitus, ecchymoses, or edema over the clavicle. Severe angulation or displacement of the fracture may result in skin tenting, indicating a high risk of progression to an open fracture. Because of the proximity of the brachial plexus and subclavian vessels to the clavicle, it is important to perform a complete neurovascular examination. Decreased distal pulses, discoloration, or edema may be present in a subclavian vessel injury. Brachial plexus injury may result in distal neurologic findings. A complete lung examination should also be performed, as an injury to the lung apex may rarely result in pneumothorax or hemothorax. Shortness of breath or diminished breath sounds may be a clinical clue. Palpation of the surrounding ribs and scapula should be performed to evaluate for possible associated rib or scapular fractures. Repetitive stress on the proximal clavicle from different activities may lead to a stress fracture in patients with no history of acute trauma.[13][14][15]

A standard anteroposterior clavicle radiograph should be obtained in all patients who present with suspected injury to the clavicle. A second 45° cephalic tilt view radiograph improves the assessment of the degree of clavicle displacement. This additional view also minimizes overlap between the first rib and the scapula. While most clavicle fractures are visible using these views, a computed tomography scan may be necessary to guide treatment in the less frequently fractured proximal or distal thirds of the clavicle to evaluate intraarticular involvement.[16] An expiratory posteroanterior chest radiograph should be obtained if there is a clinical concern for possible pneumothorax or rib injury. If there is a concern for neurovascular injury, arteriography, ultrasonography, and computed tomography may be used to guide further management. Evaluation of proximal clavicular stress fractures begins with plain radiographs and proceeds to computed tomography when indicated. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is particularly useful for assessing ligamentous injuries and associated acromioclavicular joint disruption in high-energy mechanisms. In cases of significant trauma, computed tomography angiography is recommended to rule out subclavian vessel injury.[17] Ipsilateral midshaft clavicle and acromioclavicular joint injuries are frequently underdiagnosed in high-energy trauma.[18] Routine advanced imaging, especially MRI or computed tomography, can identify these complex patterns and improve management outcomes.

Immediate orthopedic consultation should be obtained for patients with neurovascular compromise, open fractures, tenting of the skin, severe angulation or displacement, or any break in the skin near the fracture, which are absolute indications for surgery. Relative surgery indications include Neer Type II displaced distal-third fractures, fracture-shortening above 1.5 cm, or 15% of the contralateral side, floating shoulder, polytrauma, significant seizure or neuromuscular disorder, and cosmetic issues due to displacement.[19][20][21] After a complete evaluation for associated injuries and ruling out surgical indications, the mainstay of treatment for clavicle fractures is analgesia, immobilization, and proper orthopedic follow-up. In group I midshaft clavicle fractures, conservative nonoperative management is the most common approach. Treatment of these fractures consists of supportive or reductive measures. Supportive treatment involves the placement of a sling or sling and swathe, while reductive treatment includes the use of a figure-of-eight brace. Similar union rates have been achieved using either method. In uncomplicated nondisplaced midshaft fractures, patients treated nonoperatively with these conservative measures have fewer complications and a faster recovery than those treated operatively. However, in patients at higher risk of nonunion (due to fracture displacement, clavicle shortening, or fracture comminution), surgical fixation yields improved patient outcomes compared with nonoperative management. Emerging data from the most recent systematic review suggest that early fixation (<2 weeks postinjury) of displaced fractures reduces the rates of nonunion and reoperation.[22] Conservative treatment remains viable for fractures with minimal shortening (<1 cm), but operative management has demonstrated improved alignment and lower rates of malunion. In completely displaced and comminuted midshaft fractures, operative management has demonstrated improved alignment, higher union rates, lower risk of malunion, and faster return to function than nonoperative care.[2][23][Clinical outcome of conservatively managed midshaft clavicle fractures in adults, 2024] Surgical fixation is achieved with open reduction with plate fixation or intramedullary fixation.[24]

In group I midshaft clavicle fractures, conservative nonoperative management is the most common approach. Treatment of these fractures consists of supportive or reductive measures. Supportive treatment involves the placement of a sling or sling and swathe, while reductive treatment includes the use of a figure-of-eight brace. Similar union rates have been achieved using either method. In uncomplicated nondisplaced midshaft fractures, patients treated nonoperatively with these conservative measures have fewer complications and a faster recovery than those treated operatively. However, in patients at higher risk of nonunion (due to fracture displacement, clavicle shortening, or fracture comminution), surgical fixation yields improved patient outcomes compared with nonoperative management. Emerging data from the most recent systematic review suggest that early fixation (<2 weeks postinjury) of displaced fractures reduces the rates of nonunion and reoperation.[22] Conservative treatment remains viable for fractures with minimal shortening (<1 cm), but operative management has demonstrated improved alignment and lower rates of malunion. In completely displaced and comminuted midshaft fractures, operative management has demonstrated improved alignment, higher union rates, lower risk of malunion, and faster return to function than nonoperative care.[2][23][Clinical outcome of conservatively managed midshaft clavicle fractures in adults, 2024] Surgical fixation is achieved with open reduction with plate fixation or intramedullary fixation.[24] In group II distal clavicle fractures, patients should be immobilized with a simple sling or sling and swathe. Figure-of-eight braces should be avoided as they may increase fracture displacement. Given that nonunion occurs in approximately 30% of cases, orthopedic referral is necessary. Treatment remains controversial, with some studies supporting surgical fixation and others reporting comparable outcomes with nonoperative care. A 2021 multicenter randomized trial reported that operative management significantly increased union rates (95% vs 64%) for Neer Type II fractures, although 44% required hardware removal.[18][Clinical outcome of conservatively managed midshaft clavicle fractures in adults, 2024] Locking plates may yield better outcomes than hook plates in these patients.[2]

In group II distal clavicle fractures, patients should be immobilized with a simple sling or sling and swathe. Figure-of-eight braces should be avoided as they may increase fracture displacement. Given that nonunion occurs in approximately 30% of cases, orthopedic referral is necessary. Treatment remains controversial, with some studies supporting surgical fixation and others reporting comparable outcomes with nonoperative care. A 2021 multicenter randomized trial reported that operative management significantly increased union rates (95% vs 64%) for Neer Type II fractures, although 44% required hardware removal.[18][Clinical outcome of conservatively managed midshaft clavicle fractures in adults, 2024] Locking plates may yield better outcomes than hook plates in these patients.[2] Nondisplaced, proximal, group III clavicle fractures are treated conservatively, with a sling used for support and comfort. Pain control with analgesics and early range-of-motion exercises is encouraged. Significantly displaced proximal clavicle fractures are rare due to strong ligamentous support. Serious associated injuries are found in approximately 90% of displaced proximal clavicle fractures. If signs of neurovascular compromise are present, displaced proximal fractures should be reduced immediately. These patients should be evaluated carefully for severe intrathoracic injury.[25] Treatment for children is similar to that for adults. Because of the great potential for periosteal regeneration in children, healing occurs more quickly than in adults. Callus formation can be prominent in children, and parents should be educated on this normal finding.

The differential diagnosis of a clavicle fracture includes acromioclavicular joint injury, rib fracture, scapular fracture, shoulder dislocation, rotator cuff injury, and sternoclavicular joint injury. Possible complications of clavicle fractures must also be fully evaluated, including pneumothorax, brachial plexus injury, and subclavian vessel injury. An inflammatory or neoplastic process could mimic a clavicular stress fracture.

The prognosis for most clavicle fractures is good. Most clavicle fractures are treated conservatively and nonoperatively. Patients are immobilized in a sling or figure-of-eight brace until the clinical union is achieved. This typically occurs between 6 and 12 weeks in adults and between 3 and 6 weeks in children. Patients should perform range-of-motion and strengthening exercises under the supervision of physical therapy once immobilization is no longer necessary. Patients typically may resume full daily activity approximately 6 weeks after injury. Return to full contact sports requires 2 to 4 months of rehabilitation and should be preceded by radiographic evidence of bony healing, no tenderness to palpation, a full range of motion, and normal shoulder strength.

Serious complications from clavicle fractures are uncommon. Injury to the brachial plexus or subclavian vessels may occur at the time of trauma or during the healing process as callus forms. Excessive callus formation can compress the brachial plexus, potentially resulting in peripheral neuropathy. The most common complication of clavicle fractures is malunion, or when the clavicle fracture heals with angulation, shortening, or a poor cosmetic appearance. Patients with clavicle malunion typically retain full function, and most cases are clinically insignificant. Some malunions may cause neurologic or functional deficits, particularly when shortening exceeds 2 cm.[26] In patients with persistent pain, decreased range of motion, or reduced strength secondary to malunion, delayed surgical correction may be considered. Nonunion refers to a failure of fracture healing within 4 to 6 months. Among nonoperatively treated middle-third clavicle fractures, the nonunion rate is approximately 6%, rising to 15% in displaced fractures. For distal third clavicle fractures, nonunion rates range from 28% to 44%. Risk factors for nonunion include advanced age, female sex, smoking, significant fracture displacement or shortening, comminution, and inadequate immobilization. Many patients with clavicle fracture nonunion are asymptomatic and do not require further treatment. Symptomatic patients may experience persistent pain, reduced range of motion, or functional limitation and should be referred to an orthopedic surgeon for consideration of surgical management.[27] Proximal-third clavicle fracture complications include nonunion and posttraumatic arthritis. Acutely, proximal clavicle fractures displaced inwardly may result in severe intrathoracic injuries, including brachial plexus injury, subclavian vessel injury, and pneumothorax.[28] Fractures of the distal third of the clavicle have the highest incidence of nonunion; however, many of these nonunions are asymptomatic.[29] Degenerative arthritis within the acromioclavicular joint can be a late complication.

Management of clavicular fracture cases involves an interprofessional team that includes an orthopedic surgeon, an emergency department clinician, a primary care clinician, and a physical therapist to optimize evaluation, treatment, and rehabilitation. Most patients with clavicular fractures first present to the emergency department, so it is important to consult with the radiologist for the appropriate imaging studies. A thorough neurovascular and lung exam is necessary, as bone damage can compromise these structures (see Image. Right Clavicle Fracture). Most clavicular fractures are managed conservatively.[30][31] However, immediate orthopedic consultation should be obtained for patients with neurovascular compromise, open fractures, tenting of the skin, or any break in the skin near the fracture.[32][33] The orthopedic nurse should inform the patient that a visible prominence may persist for months and is a normal part of the healing process. If the patient continues to have pain and difficulty with motion, then nonunion should be suspected. The patient should be informed that a return to sports should occur only after complete healing. The fracture may take 8 to 12 weeks to heal, and most patients have a good outcome. However, a few patients may have chronic shoulder pain and limited shoulder range of motion.