Browse the corpus

Walk the Even Hospital Database by book and chapter — the raw source passages that ground Ask, DDx, and the rest.

4 passages

introductionstatpearls· Introduction· item NBK534783

Medical anti-shock trousers (MAST), military anti-shock trousers, or pneumatic anti-shock garments (PASG) are medical devices made of synthetic inflatable air bladders applied to a patient’s abdomen, pelvis, and lower extremities.[1] These devices include 1 abdominal compartment and 2 leg compartments, which attach to a pump or inflation unit with valves to control the pressure within each air bladder. The underlying physiologic concept of these devices is simple: apply pressure to the lower extremities to auto-transfuse or shift the patient’s blood volume from the abdomen, pelvis, and lower extremities to the upper body and central circulation. It was also thought these devices increased overall peripheral vascular resistance, halted intraabdominal and lower extremity bleeding, and splinted lower extremity fractures. Medical anti-shock trousers were first described in 1903 by surgeon G.W. Crile as he tried to augment blood pressure with a "pneumatic rubber suit" during neurosurgical procedures. Decades later, the term military anti-shock trouser was coined during the Vietnam War, when medics applied the device in the field before airlifting soldiers out of a combat zone to a hospital for definitive care.[2][3] Upon the conclusion of the Vietnam War in 1975, military surgeons and combat medics returned to the United States. They advocated for using these devices in pre-hospital and critical care settings. In 1977, the Committee on Trauma for the American College of Surgeons listed MAST as an essential device in all ambulances. Throughout the United States in the late 1970s and 1980s, MAST devices were the standard of care for hypotensive trauma patients, as evidenced by the American College of Surgeons’ Advanced Trauma Life Support guidelines.[4][5] These devices were utilized heavily through the 1980s, and as late as 1996, 30 states required MAST devices on all ambulances.[6] These devices were applied in various settings, including aviation, combat, pre-hospital, and critical care settings.

introductionstatpearls· Introduction· item NBK534783

Medical anti-shock trousers were first described in 1903 by surgeon G.W. Crile as he tried to augment blood pressure with a "pneumatic rubber suit" during neurosurgical procedures. Decades later, the term military anti-shock trouser was coined during the Vietnam War, when medics applied the device in the field before airlifting soldiers out of a combat zone to a hospital for definitive care.[2][3] Upon the conclusion of the Vietnam War in 1975, military surgeons and combat medics returned to the United States. They advocated for using these devices in pre-hospital and critical care settings. In 1977, the Committee on Trauma for the American College of Surgeons listed MAST as an essential device in all ambulances. Throughout the United States in the late 1970s and 1980s, MAST devices were the standard of care for hypotensive trauma patients, as evidenced by the American College of Surgeons’ Advanced Trauma Life Support guidelines.[4][5] These devices were utilized heavily through the 1980s, and as late as 1996, 30 states required MAST devices on all ambulances.[6] These devices were applied in various settings, including aviation, combat, pre-hospital, and critical care settings. Despite a period of widespread use, MAST devices have been the subject of much debate and research and are currently rarely used. Initial studies in the 1970s suggested that as much as 20% of a patient's total blood volume was auto-transfused to the upper body by application of the MAST device.[7][8] However, further studies performed in the 1980s refuted these early findings, suggesting that only 5% or less of a patient’s overall blood volume was auto-transfused by these devices in both human and dog models.[9][10] During this period, some studies showed harmful complications of device use, which included compartment syndrome and lower extremity ischemia, amongst others.[11] In 1989, the Houston Fire Department partnered with Ben Taub Hospital to investigate the use of MAST devices in the prehospital environment. This study, which enrolled 201 patients randomized either to MAST application or standard care, did not demonstrate an improvement in mortality rates in penetrating abdominal trauma.[12] Further studies corroborated these findings and could not show a significant difference in the length of hospitalization or intensive care unit stay.[13] Amidst this controversy, the National Association of Emergency Medical Services Physicians published a 1997 position paper citing support for MAST in certain cases, including ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, pelvic fracture with subsequent hypotension, and severe traumatic hypotension.[14] Of these recommendations, the only high-level evidence, considered Class I, existed for a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.[15] In 2002, a Cochran review demonstrated an increase in intensive care unit length of stay by 1.7 days. It concluded there was no evidence to suggest a reduction in mortality from using MAST.[5] Given these findings, many hospital systems and EMS agencies gradually abandoned using these devices. An article published in the United Kingdom in 1995 suggested that only 1 out of every 5 UK hospitals and 1 out of every 12 UK EMS systems continued to use these devices.[16]

complicationsstatpearls· Complications· item NBK534783

The complications that can manifest with MAST pants are as follows: Lower extremity ischemia Compartment syndrome Respiratory failure Increased intracranial pressure Acute kidney injury Metabolic acidosis

enhancing_healthcare_team_outcomesstatpearls· Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes· item NBK534783

An evidence-based team approach involving clinicians in MAST use is recommended. Resuscitation of critically ill patients is a topic of constant scrutiny and frequent disagreement among leaders in the field, and many studies have been published on this topic each year. The MAST device is an example of 1 of the many practices that were once the standard of care but expired as medical knowledge advanced. It is the responsibility of medical professionals to advance the knowledge and tools available to provide the best medical care. As medical knowledge and technology advance, so should the standard of care medical professionals provide their patients.