Browse the corpus

Walk the Even Hospital Database by book and chapter — the raw source passages that ground Ask, DDx, and the rest.

4 passages

contentuptodate· Content· item f0_40_648

©2013 UpToDate ® Print Email ACR relative radiation information (Part 1 of 2) References: Royal College of Radiologists. Making the best use of a department of clinical radiology: guidelines for doctors. 5th ed. London: The Royal College of Radiologists; 2003. Martin CJ. Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures? Br J Radiol 2007; 80(956):639-647. International Commission on Radiological Protection, 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 60. Ann ICRP 1991; 21:1-3. Bor D, Sancak T, Olgar T, et al. Comparison of effective doses obtained from dose-area product and air kerma measurements in interventional radiology. Br J Radiol 2004; 77(916):315-322. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Exposure of the US population from diagnostic medical radiation, NCRP Report No. 100. Bethesda, MD; 1989. Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors. Nationwide Evaluation of X-Ray Trends (NEXT) - Tabulation and Graphical Summary of 2000 Survey of Computed Tomography: file://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ct/2000survey.html; 2007: In publication: CRCPD publication no. E-07-02. United States Pharmacopeia Drug Information: Drug Information for the Health Care Professional. 27th ed. Greenwood Village, CO: Thomson Micromedex; 2007. ICRP Publication 80: Radiation Dose to Patients from Radiopharmaceuticals. Rev ed: Elsevier; September 1, 1999. Mettler FA, Jr., Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 2008; 248(1):254-263. Wall BF, Hart D. Revised radiation doses for typical X-ray examinations. Report on a recent review of doses to patients from medical X-ray examinations in the UK by NRPB. National Radiological Protection Board. Br J Radiol 1997; 70(833):437-439. Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, National Research Council. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII phase 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States., NCRP Report No. 93. Bethesda, MD; 1987. Amis ES, Jr., Butler PF, Applegate KE, et al. American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 4(5):272-284.

contentuptodate· Content· item f0_40_648

Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, National Research Council. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII phase 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States., NCRP Report No. 93. Bethesda, MD; 1987. Amis ES, Jr., Butler PF, Applegate KE, et al. American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 4(5):272-284. National Cancer Institute. Radiation Risks and Pediatric Computed Tomography (CT): A Guide for Health Care Providers. file://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/causes/radiation-risks-pediatric-CT. Accessed August 2009. ACR practice guideline for imaging pregnant or potentially pregnant adolescents and women with ionizing radiation. In: Practice Guidelines and Technical Standards. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology; 2008:23-37. American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria.

contentuptodate· Content· item f35_37_36442

Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, National Research Council. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII phase 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States., NCRP Report No. 93. Bethesda, MD; 1987. Amis ES, Jr., Butler PF, Applegate KE, et al. American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 4(5):272-284. National Cancer Institute. Radiation Risks and Pediatric Computed Tomography (CT): A Guide for Health Care Providers. file://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/causes/radiation-risks-pediatric-CT. Accessed August 2009. ACR practice guideline for imaging pregnant or potentially pregnant adolescents and women with ionizing radiation. In: Practice Guidelines and Technical Standards. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology; 2008:23-37. American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria. ACR relative radiation information (Part 2 of 2) References: Royal College of Radiologists. Making the best use of a department of clinical radiology: guidelines for doctors. 5th ed. London: The Royal College of Radiologists; 2003. Martin CJ. Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures? Br J Radiol 2007; 80(956):639-647. International Commission on Radiological Protection, 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 60. Ann ICRP 1991; 21:1-3. Bor D, Sancak T, Olgar T, et al. Comparison of effective doses obtained from dose-area product and air kerma measurements in interventional radiology. Br J Radiol 2004; 77(916):315-322. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Exposure of the US population from diagnostic medical radiation, NCRP Report No. 100. Bethesda, MD; 1989. Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors. Nationwide Evaluation of X-Ray Trends (NEXT) - Tabulation and Graphical Summary of 2000 Survey of Computed Tomography: file://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ct/2000survey.html; 2007: In publication: CRCPD publication no. E-07-02. United States Pharmacopeia Drug Information: Drug Information for the Health Care Professional. 27th ed. Greenwood Village, CO: Thomson Micromedex; 2007.

contentuptodate· Content· item f35_37_36442

Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors. Nationwide Evaluation of X-Ray Trends (NEXT) - Tabulation and Graphical Summary of 2000 Survey of Computed Tomography: file://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ct/2000survey.html; 2007: In publication: CRCPD publication no. E-07-02. United States Pharmacopeia Drug Information: Drug Information for the Health Care Professional. 27th ed. Greenwood Village, CO: Thomson Micromedex; 2007. ICRP Publication 80: Radiation Dose to Patients from Radiopharmaceuticals. Rev ed: Elsevier; September 1, 1999. Mettler FA, Jr., Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 2008; 248(1):254-263. Wall BF, Hart D. Revised radiation doses for typical X-ray examinations. Report on a recent review of doses to patients from medical X-ray examinations in the UK by NRPB. National Radiological Protection Board. Br J Radiol 1997; 70(833):437-439. Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, National Research Council. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII phase 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States., NCRP Report No. 93. Bethesda, MD; 1987. Amis ES, Jr., Butler PF, Applegate KE, et al. American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 4(5):272-284. National Cancer Institute. Radiation Risks and Pediatric Computed Tomography (CT): A Guide for Health Care Providers. file://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/causes/radiation-risks-pediatric-CT. Accessed August 2009. ACR practice guideline for imaging pregnant or potentially pregnant adolescents and women with ionizing radiation. In: Practice Guidelines and Technical Standards. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology; 2008:23-37. American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria.