Browse the corpus

Walk the Even Hospital Database by book and chapter — the raw source passages that ground Ask, DDx, and the rest.

2 passages

referencesuptodate· REFERENCES· item f31_0_31751

REFERENCES National Foundation-March of Dimes Symposium on Genetic Counseling, Genetic counseling, with particular reference to anticipatory guidance and the prevention of birth defects. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1970. Marks, JH. Genetic counseling principles in action: a casebook. White Plains, NY: National Foundation March of Dimes, 1989. Baker, DL, Schuette, JL, Uhlmann, WR. A guide to genetic counseling. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1998. Schuette, JL, Bennett, RL. Lessons in history: Obtaining the family history and constructing a pedigree. In: A Guide to Genetic Counseling, Baker, DL, Schuette, JL, Uhlmann, WR (Eds), Wiley-Liss 1998. p.27. Bernhardt BA, Haunstetter CM, Roter D, Geller G. How do obstetric providers discuss referrals for prenatal genetic counseling? J Genet Couns 2005; 14:109. Tyrala EE. The infant of the diabetic mother. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1996; 23:221. Friedman JM. Epidemiology of neurofibromatosis type 1. Am J Med Genet 1999; 89:1. Clarke A. Hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. J Med Genet 1987; 24:659. Steel JM, Johnstone FD, Hepburn DA, Smith AF. Can prepregnancy care of diabetic women reduce the risk of abnormal babies? BMJ 1990; 301:1070. Ostrer H. A genetic profile of contemporary Jewish populations. Nat Rev Genet 2001; 2:891. Bloch M, Adam S, Fuller A, et al. Diagnosis of Huntington disease: a model for the stages of psychological response based on experience of a predictive testing program. Am J Med Genet 1993; 47:368. Peshkin BN, Lerman C. Genetic counselling for hereditary breast cancer. Lancet 1999; 353:2176. Young, Ian D. Introduction to risk calculation in genetic counseling. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. file://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/spotlight/the-genetic-information-nondiscrimination-act-gina. (Accessed on January 06, 2011). Salman M, Jhanwar SC, Ostrer H. Will the new cytogenetics replace the old cytogenetics? Clin Genet 2004; 66:265. Wright CF, Burton H. The use of cell-free fetal nucleic acids in maternal blood for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis. Hum Reprod Update 2009; 15:139. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 446: array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114:1161.

referencesuptodate· REFERENCES· item f31_0_31751

Salman M, Jhanwar SC, Ostrer H. Will the new cytogenetics replace the old cytogenetics? Clin Genet 2004; 66:265. Wright CF, Burton H. The use of cell-free fetal nucleic acids in maternal blood for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis. Hum Reprod Update 2009; 15:139. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 446: array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114:1161. Hillman SC, Pretlove S, Coomarasamy A, et al. Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37:6. Topic 461 Version 10.0 © 2013 UpToDate, Inc. All rights reserved. | Subscription and License Agreement | Release: 21.6- C21.56 Licensed to: AsanBook Dig. Med. Lib. | Support Tag: [0604-125.39.66.147-9C35C7E240-S244013.14]